2016
DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2016.1187114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Getting to [un]know you’: opening up constructions and imaginations of youth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We took as our theoretical grounding that children and youth are complicated, and neither inherently at-risk (Loutzenheiser, 2015;Macintosh, 2007) or innocent (Bruhm & Hurley, 2004;Stockton, 2009). Within this work we interrogate queer, trans and nonbinary youth as concept (Lesko, 2001;Talburt, 2004), knowing that the youth and their queerness, non-binaryness and transness are already defined (Lesko & Talburt, 2012), their identities concretized in the multiple spaces they occupy as " children" "youth" such as schools, where they are refused entrance as "queer" "trans" and/or "nonbinary" (Stiegler, 2017). We are interested in difference and how thinking with the concepts of queer, gender nonbinary and transgender in educative spaces opens up theorizing and analyzing the complicated enmeshments of sexuality and gender identity, race, colonizing/decolonizing and ability (Brockenbrough & Boatwright, 2013;Cruz, 2011).…”
Section: Perspective or Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We took as our theoretical grounding that children and youth are complicated, and neither inherently at-risk (Loutzenheiser, 2015;Macintosh, 2007) or innocent (Bruhm & Hurley, 2004;Stockton, 2009). Within this work we interrogate queer, trans and nonbinary youth as concept (Lesko, 2001;Talburt, 2004), knowing that the youth and their queerness, non-binaryness and transness are already defined (Lesko & Talburt, 2012), their identities concretized in the multiple spaces they occupy as " children" "youth" such as schools, where they are refused entrance as "queer" "trans" and/or "nonbinary" (Stiegler, 2017). We are interested in difference and how thinking with the concepts of queer, gender nonbinary and transgender in educative spaces opens up theorizing and analyzing the complicated enmeshments of sexuality and gender identity, race, colonizing/decolonizing and ability (Brockenbrough & Boatwright, 2013;Cruz, 2011).…”
Section: Perspective or Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%