The trouble with culturally diverse theory in feminist psychology is that everything is trouble. We begin with a paradox: Feminist thinking in the social sciences (and of critical thought in general) has generated provocative and trenchant analyses that simultaneously render the most basic tools, language, and even the very institution of science problematic. Over the past 25 years, feminist and critical psychologists have uncovered the androcentric axes structuring what is taken to be "psychology" and what psychologists aspire to when we make "theory." They have uncovered unsettling components that comprised our traditional categories of "woman" and "gender." Such critical scrutiny has revealed troublesome implications that arise from studying cultural diversity, including problems with the From the outset, our task to approach the possibility of cultural diverse theory in psychology posed plentiful troubles, and we soon discovered that we could do nothing less than make trouble. Later, we encountered Judith Butler's mapping of gender trouble and are indebted to her extensive analyses. We also thank Melanie Killen, Hope Landrine, Roslyn Mendelson, Scott PIOUS, and Robert Steele for their critical readings and suggestions. Preparation of this chapter was supported in part by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Postdoctoral Fellowship awarded to