2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10745-021-00293-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Getting It Right in Rural Development Initiatives: The Importance of Livelihood Assets in Commercializing Family Farm Production in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Livelihoods Approach theoretical framework (Scoones, 2009;Carney, 2003) advocates for the reconfiguration of availability, access, and use of resources (land, capital, labor, knowledge, technologies, power) as key elements in the survival strategies and market integration of small-scale farmers (Van der Ploeg et al, 2000). Researchers and development agencies employ this theoretical approach to understand how farmers navigate constraints in economic, social, and environmental spheres (Cavalcante et al, 2022). In agriculture, resources correspond to different types of capital (natural, financial, human, social, etc.)…”
Section: The Livelihoods Of Family Farmersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Livelihoods Approach theoretical framework (Scoones, 2009;Carney, 2003) advocates for the reconfiguration of availability, access, and use of resources (land, capital, labor, knowledge, technologies, power) as key elements in the survival strategies and market integration of small-scale farmers (Van der Ploeg et al, 2000). Researchers and development agencies employ this theoretical approach to understand how farmers navigate constraints in economic, social, and environmental spheres (Cavalcante et al, 2022). In agriculture, resources correspond to different types of capital (natural, financial, human, social, etc.)…”
Section: The Livelihoods Of Family Farmersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, based on the results of Cavalcante et al (2022) about the contributions of livelihoods to the inclusion of family farmers in markets, this study seeks to identify whether livelihoods mediate the effects of ATER on the quality of life of producers assisted by Emater in the state of Goiás. Livelihoods are understood from the theoretical perspective of the Livelihoods Approach (Van der Ploeg et al, 2000;Carney, 2003;Ellis & Freeman, 2004;Scoones, 2009) as the set of resources (natural, financial, human, and social capital) whose availability, access, and use determine the survival strategies and integration of small farmers into markets (Cavalcante et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tora et al ( 2022) emphasize poverty has a significant impact on the sustainability of livelihoods, and the relationship between poverty and sustainability is complex. Addressing the interplay between poverty and livelihood sustainability requires a multifaceted approach that recognizes the unique challenges faced by impoverished populations and aims to empower them to build more resilient and sustainable livelihoods (da Silva Cavalcante et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to help build resilience and facilitate climate-friendly activities in rural areas, multiple so-called help efforts for development projects were or are underway in Africa [1,2]. Although displaying poor performance, most of these projects are not technically or scientifically well documented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various reasons have been given to explain the failure of these rural development irrigation projects. Social capital-the bonds people form through friendship and acquaintances-is considered a key resource for achieving development project success, especially in the collective maintenance of wide infrastructure and commercialization [1,2]. Similar to this factor, others have pointed to the weak administrative organization of governmental institutions and NGOs, i.e., such as in the failure of the South Korea-funded project in DR Congo [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%