2006
DOI: 10.1515/iral.2006.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gestural introduction of Ground reference in L2 narrative discourse

Abstract: In the field of second language acquisition (SLA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Choi & Lantolf, in press;Kellerman & van Hoof, 2003;Negueruela, Lantolf, Rehn Jordan, & Gelabert, 2004;Stam, 2006), or in terms of gestural forms, expressing different semantic content in gestures than native speakers (e.g. Brown, 2007;Brown & Gullberg, in press;Gullberg, submitted;Negueruela et al, 2004;Özyürek, 2002b;Yoshioka & Kellerman, 2006). Such findings are often discussed in terms of Slobin's notion of 'thinking for speaking' (e.g.…”
Section: Cross-linguistic Influences (Cli) or Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choi & Lantolf, in press;Kellerman & van Hoof, 2003;Negueruela, Lantolf, Rehn Jordan, & Gelabert, 2004;Stam, 2006), or in terms of gestural forms, expressing different semantic content in gestures than native speakers (e.g. Brown, 2007;Brown & Gullberg, in press;Gullberg, submitted;Negueruela et al, 2004;Özyürek, 2002b;Yoshioka & Kellerman, 2006). Such findings are often discussed in terms of Slobin's notion of 'thinking for speaking' (e.g.…”
Section: Cross-linguistic Influences (Cli) or Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, "cross-linguistic influence" would be distinguished from "crosscultural influence", a difference that explains various existing empirical findings in the gesture literature such as preferential marking of movement over location in the gestures of second language speakers as a result of typological differences in the mapping of semantics onto morphosyntactic resources (cf. Yoshioka & Kellerman, 2006) versus unique gesture frequencies in the gestures of second language speakers as a result of cultural differences in rates of gesture production (cf. Pika et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have found evidence of a "manual accent" (Kellerman & van Hoof, 2003) in L2 production. These include studies of gesture placement within the L2 utterance (Kellerman & van Hoof, 2003;Negueruela, Lantolf, Jordan, & Gelabert, 2004;Stam, 2006) and prominent marking of specific concepts in L2 gestures such as movement over location (Yoshioka & Kellerman, 2006) and manner of motion (Brown & Gullberg, 2008). Moreover, in some cases, gesture analyses uniquely reveal L1 conceptualizations masked in otherwise proficient L2 speech (Gullberg, submitted).…”
Section: Cross-linguistic Interactions In Co-speech Gesturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…He concluded that not only do gestures promote language learning, but they engender a "positive interaction between the two participants, helping to create a sense of shared social, symbolic, physical and mental space. Yoshioka and Kellerman (2006) stated that, in the field of Second Language Acquisition (SLA) and use, learners' gestures have mainly been regarded as a type of communication strategy produced to replace missing words. Gullberg (1998) also investigated the use of gestural communication strategies, as opposed to oral communication strategies, by foreign language speakers of French and Swedish.…”
Section: The Role Of Gestures In Second Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%