2006
DOI: 10.3895/s1808-04482006000300001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gestão Estratégica Do Conhecimento No Contexto Organizacional Brasileiro: Proposta De Mapeamento Conceitual

Abstract: Este artigo apresenta-se como uma tentativa de demarcação conceitual da temática conhecida como gestão do conhecimento (GC). Longe de almejar propor uma solução definitiva ou um modelo acabado, espera-se contribuir para um melhor entendimento da área. Propõe-se um mapeamento conceitual integrativo adaptado daquele originalmente proposto por CHOO (1998), o qual se associa à idéia de contexto capacitante e às várias abordagens e ferramentas gerenciaismetaforicamente denominadas de "guarda chuva conceitual da GC"… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
20

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
12
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…This group of enabling condition also considered businesses processes where the concept of ba was actually applied in different researches. Here is a summary of our findings that can be useful guidelines for the management of enabling contexts in knowledge organizations: organizational culture: a critical issue to facilitate knowledge creation, a central issue to be shaped in a firm's ability to manage its knowledge more effectively and the most prominent enabler (Inkpen, 1996;Perez Bustamante, 1999;Gold et al, 2001;Lee and Choi, 2002;Roth, 2003;Alvarenga Neto, 2005;Adenfelt andLagerstrom, 2006 von Krogh et al, 2008;); organizational structure: involves organizational structure that foster solid relationships and effective collaboration, such as project teams, cross-divisional units and empowered divisions, among others (von Krogh et al, 2000;Lee and Choi, 2003); systems-based approach, hypertext organization (Gold et al, 2001, Nonaka et al, 2006; autonomous and self-organizing teams (Peltokorpi et al, 2007); organizational and inter-organizational processes: involves the application or studies/research of the concept of ba into business processes such as the management of salesforces (Bennet, 2001), ex ante project risk (Cuellar and Gallivan, 2005), supply-chain (Wu, 2008), inter-organizational healthcare communities (von Krogh et al, 2008), firms in networks (Lechner and Dowling, 2003), transnational projects (Adenfelt and Lagerstrom, 2006), family business context (Brannback,et al, 2008), industrial districts (Corno et al, 1999) and collaborative inter-organizational R&D projects (Johnson, 2000); Human Resources Management and organizational learning initiatives/projects: regards reward systems linked to knowledge-sharing (von Krogh et al, 2008) and the existence of flexible learning objectives (Inkpen, 1996); the cultivation of care through incentive systems, mentoring and training programs in care based behavior, project debriefing and other forms of learning-oriented conversations …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This group of enabling condition also considered businesses processes where the concept of ba was actually applied in different researches. Here is a summary of our findings that can be useful guidelines for the management of enabling contexts in knowledge organizations: organizational culture: a critical issue to facilitate knowledge creation, a central issue to be shaped in a firm's ability to manage its knowledge more effectively and the most prominent enabler (Inkpen, 1996;Perez Bustamante, 1999;Gold et al, 2001;Lee and Choi, 2002;Roth, 2003;Alvarenga Neto, 2005;Adenfelt andLagerstrom, 2006 von Krogh et al, 2008;); organizational structure: involves organizational structure that foster solid relationships and effective collaboration, such as project teams, cross-divisional units and empowered divisions, among others (von Krogh et al, 2000;Lee and Choi, 2003); systems-based approach, hypertext organization (Gold et al, 2001, Nonaka et al, 2006; autonomous and self-organizing teams (Peltokorpi et al, 2007); organizational and inter-organizational processes: involves the application or studies/research of the concept of ba into business processes such as the management of salesforces (Bennet, 2001), ex ante project risk (Cuellar and Gallivan, 2005), supply-chain (Wu, 2008), inter-organizational healthcare communities (von Krogh et al, 2008), firms in networks (Lechner and Dowling, 2003), transnational projects (Adenfelt and Lagerstrom, 2006), family business context (Brannback,et al, 2008), industrial districts (Corno et al, 1999) and collaborative inter-organizational R&D projects (Johnson, 2000); Human Resources Management and organizational learning initiatives/projects: regards reward systems linked to knowledge-sharing (von Krogh et al, 2008) and the existence of flexible learning objectives (Inkpen, 1996); the cultivation of care through incentive systems, mentoring and training programs in care based behavior, project debriefing and other forms of learning-oriented conversations …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…care, mutual trust, lenience in judgment, active empathy, courage and access to help (Inkpen, 1996;von Krogh, 1998;Burton, 2002;Lee and Choi, 2003;von Krogh et al, 2008); tolerance to "honest" mistakes and mutual respect (Alvarenga Neto, 2005); actively encouragement of participation, nurture of innovating language while avoiding hypercorrection (von Krogh et al, 2000); accessibility of individuals and attentive inquiry (Nonaka and Nishiguch, 2001); interaction and open dialogue (Gold et al, 2001;Sabherwal and Becerra-Fernandes, 2003), collaboration (Lee and Choi, 2003); autonomy of freedom (Ford and Angermeir, 2005); contextual social interactions and evolving relationships (Peltokorpi et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alvarenga Neto (2008) descreve que a GC consolidou-se como uma grande área guarda-chuva que incorpora conceitos da Ciência da Informação, Administração e Ciência da Computação. Envolve atividades como a gestão de documentos, mapeamento de competências, compartilhamento do conhecimento, mapeamento de processos, construção de sentidos, criação de conhecimento, tomada de decisão.…”
Section: Gestão Do Conhecimentounclassified