2018
DOI: 10.1111/ggi.13524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index for independent walking function in maintenance hemodialysis patients: A single‐facility retrospective cohort study

Abstract: Aim The target Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) for patients on chronic maintenance hemodialysis is unclear. We aimed to determine the relationship between the GNRI and independent walking ability in such patients. Methods In the present retrospective cohort study, 90 patients receiving chronic maintenance hemodialysis were included. Logistic regression analyses were carried out to evaluate the relationship between the GNRI and independent walking ability. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Referring to the previous study investigating the relationship between sarcopenia and GNRI, muscle strength and muscle mass were found to be related to GNRI, 17 and the cut-off value of GNRI for maintaining gait ability on their own was 86.7. 18 To estimate sarcopenia, we considered that the findings of the previous studies support the results in our present study, which are useful to investigate whether the value GNRI should be <90 in assessing nutritional status. Furthermore, in the analysis by age group, we should note that GNRI decreases along with increasing age; nearly half of all patients aged >70 years had GNRI of <90.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Referring to the previous study investigating the relationship between sarcopenia and GNRI, muscle strength and muscle mass were found to be related to GNRI, 17 and the cut-off value of GNRI for maintaining gait ability on their own was 86.7. 18 To estimate sarcopenia, we considered that the findings of the previous studies support the results in our present study, which are useful to investigate whether the value GNRI should be <90 in assessing nutritional status. Furthermore, in the analysis by age group, we should note that GNRI decreases along with increasing age; nearly half of all patients aged >70 years had GNRI of <90.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Multivariate analysis accounted for difference in white blood cell counts, hemoglobin, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, preprocedural WIfI clinical stages, and pre-intervention ABI (posterior tibial). GNRI, geriatric nutritional risk index; HR, hazard ratio; MALE, major adverse limb events [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] ability, 27 likely related to its association with sarcopenia and bone density. 28,29 In our CLTI population, the GNRI results also correlate well with PIII, a surgical risk score validated for patients with CLTI undergoing bypass surgery to predict 1 year AFS.…”
Section: Gnri On Not Only Mortality and Major Amputation In A Primarilymentioning
confidence: 99%