2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2006.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geostatistical and multivariate analysis of the horizontal distribution of an earthworm community in El Molar (Madrid, Spain)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Spatial structure in earthworm communities has been related mainly to environmental heterogeneity posed by soil and vegetation patchiness and to environmental gradients at larger scale (Decaëns et al, 2009; Jiménez et al, 2011). Hernández et al (2007) used geostatistical and multivariate analysis to explain the relationships between the horizontal distribution of earthworm communities and some soil factors in grassland in Madrid Spain. Jiménez et al (2011) combined SADIE analysis to detect gap and patch clusters and association/dissociation between earthworm species with geostatistics, to investigate the spatial distribution of an earthworm community together with the heterogeneity of selected soil properties in a gallery forest of the Colombian “Llanos.” The degree of autocorrelation of spatial pattern was assessed with semi-variogram and they used the partial Mantel test to explain the relationship between the spatial pattern of earthworm density and soil environmental variables, concluding that the earthworm community of this gallery forest showed a random structure in a spatially clumped soil environment.…”
Section: Methods To Measure Spatial Structure Of Organisms In Field Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial structure in earthworm communities has been related mainly to environmental heterogeneity posed by soil and vegetation patchiness and to environmental gradients at larger scale (Decaëns et al, 2009; Jiménez et al, 2011). Hernández et al (2007) used geostatistical and multivariate analysis to explain the relationships between the horizontal distribution of earthworm communities and some soil factors in grassland in Madrid Spain. Jiménez et al (2011) combined SADIE analysis to detect gap and patch clusters and association/dissociation between earthworm species with geostatistics, to investigate the spatial distribution of an earthworm community together with the heterogeneity of selected soil properties in a gallery forest of the Colombian “Llanos.” The degree of autocorrelation of spatial pattern was assessed with semi-variogram and they used the partial Mantel test to explain the relationship between the spatial pattern of earthworm density and soil environmental variables, concluding that the earthworm community of this gallery forest showed a random structure in a spatially clumped soil environment.…”
Section: Methods To Measure Spatial Structure Of Organisms In Field Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important factors affecting earthworm distribution such as soil texture, pH, total nitrogen and organic oxidable carbon were measured (see Hernández et al, 2007, and references herein for methods).…”
Section: Environmental Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Golldack (2006) indicated that the distribution of A. caliginosa genotypes was not related to soil properties. Nevertheless, the relationship between earthworm distribution and soil factors is well known (Edwards, 2004) and specifically H. elisae's abundance is proved to be positively correlated with total and coarse sands and negatively with clay, nitrogen, carbon and coarse loam contents (Hernández et al, 2007).…”
Section: What Causes These Deep Divergencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across a range of ecosystems, earthworm species are spatially distributed in clusters ranging from as small as 7 m in diameter (Rossi 2003b) to more than 100 m (Hernández et al 2007). However, the majority of spatial ranges of autocorrelation lies within 20-50 m. Adult individuals of L. terrestris consistently live in small clusters (~20 m) compared to other species, presumably related to its surface mating behaviour.…”
Section: Spatial Autocorrelation and Sampling Designmentioning
confidence: 99%