2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2004.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geostatistical analysis of sorptivity for a soil under tilled and no-tilled conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
23
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…where z(x) is the value of the variable at site x, z(x i +h) is another sample value separated by a distance h and N is the number of pairs separated by a distance h. The semivariogram is defined as the arithmetic mean of all the squares of the differences between pairs of experimental values separated by a distance h, or increments variance of the regionalized variable in localizations separated a distance h (Sepaskhah et al, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where z(x) is the value of the variable at site x, z(x i +h) is another sample value separated by a distance h and N is the number of pairs separated by a distance h. The semivariogram is defined as the arithmetic mean of all the squares of the differences between pairs of experimental values separated by a distance h, or increments variance of the regionalized variable in localizations separated a distance h (Sepaskhah et al, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After evaluating the spatial dependence by attribute, the ordinary kriging technique was implemented (Sepaskhah et al, 2005) to carry out spatial prediction at sites not sampled and finally build contour maps by attribute, using the program Surfer v.9 (Golden Software, Golden, Colorado, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies comparing no-tillage and conventional tillage indicate that the main effects of management are an increase in soil bulk density in the top 0.20 m and a decrease in total porosity, especially in relation to the decrease in soil macroporosity and the increase in soil resistance to penetration in no-tillage systems (Tormena et al, 1999a;Stone and Silveira, 2001;Tormena et al, 2004;Falleiro et al, 2003;Sepaskhah et al, 2005). Regarding weed occurrence, the systems are also influential, mainly in terms of the higher weed density and biomass in conventional tillage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For studies on the spatial distribution patterns of soil properties, techniques such as conventional statistics and geostatistics were widely applied (Saldana et al 1998, McGrath and Zhang 2003, Sepaskhah et al 2005, and based on the theory of a regionalized variable (Matheron 1963, Webster andOliver 2001), geostatistics provides advanced tools to quantify the spatial features of soil parameters and allows for spatial interpolation to be conducted. The research benefits of the geographic information systems (GIS) approach were illustrated by many ecological and agricultural studies (Bradshaw andMuller 1998, Wang et al 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%