Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-1693-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric Sums: Bounds for Rare Events with Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
191
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
191
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It follows from the limit theory for random sums (Brown 1990, Kalashnikov 1997, Kozubowski & Panorska 1998 that if the number of terms in the summation, N, follows a geometric distribution with mean 1/p, then under certain conditions when the number of terms increases (p → 0),…”
Section: Stochastic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It follows from the limit theory for random sums (Brown 1990, Kalashnikov 1997, Kozubowski & Panorska 1998 that if the number of terms in the summation, N, follows a geometric distribution with mean 1/p, then under certain conditions when the number of terms increases (p → 0),…”
Section: Stochastic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, this translates into the following question: How small does p have to be for the exponential approximation of the random sum to be reasonable? Like any other rate of convergence problem, this is a difficult mathematical question, and there are few results and only for special cases (Brown 1990, Kalashnikov 1997; see Appendix 1 for additional details). In practice, it is recommended to employ goodness-of-fit statistics for the exponential match to the distribution of regime magnitude.…”
Section: Stochastic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let C k denote the length of the kth cycle, where the first cycle starts at time C 0 = τ z . Let S k = k i=0 C i and let K(t) denote the current cycle at time t. Then S K(τy)−1 ≤ τ y = S K(τy)−1 + τ y , where τ y is distributed as the first hitting time of level y, starting from z and given that the process stays above z. Renyi's theorem states that if µ C = E(C 1 → denotes weak convergence and Z is an exponential random variable with unit mean (see the extended version given as Theorem 2.4 in [17]). Let ξ i = max{X t |t ∈ [S i , S i+1 ]} denote the ith cycle maximum and G(y) = P(ξ 1 ≤ y) = 1 − P(K(τ y ) = 1) the common distribution function of the ξ i .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…non-negative random variables, if P g (x CR ) is sufficient small (i.e. R << a), by applying the Rényi Theorem [19], the proof follows:…”
Section: Appendix B Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%