Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.1239/jap/1308662628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hitting Times and the Running Maximum of Markovian Growth-Collapse Processes

Abstract: We consider a Markovian growth collapse process on the state space E = [0, ∞) which evolves as follows. Between random downward jumps the process increases with slope one. Both the jump intensity and the jump sizes depend on the current state of the process. We are interested in the behavior of the first hitting time τ y = inf{t ≥ 0|X t = y} as y becomes large and the growth of the maximum process M t = sup{X s |0 ≤ s ≤ t} as t → ∞. We consider the recursive sequence of equations Am n = m n−1 , m 0 ≡ 1, where … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that this result matches the result reported in [37,Section 4.2], in which the authors instead use a martingale approach for the derivation of the recursive equation satisfied by the Laplace-Stieltjes transform of the exit time.…”
Section: Exit Identitiessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that this result matches the result reported in [37,Section 4.2], in which the authors instead use a martingale approach for the derivation of the recursive equation satisfied by the Laplace-Stieltjes transform of the exit time.…”
Section: Exit Identitiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This proves (36) for a > c/p. For a ≤ c/p, instead, we note that E pa [e −wτ ā ↓c (pa) ] = 1, so that now (37) becomes…”
Section: Exit Identities For Reflected Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following lemma generalizes formula (28) in [8]. Proof: The process X t , if started in the state x ∈ I θ will leave I θ only at the moment when it passes through the upper boundary z * (θ ) and ν(x, y) = 0 for y < z * (θ ).…”
Section: A Growth Collapse Process With Generalized Memoryless Jumpsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In this section we consider a piecewise deterministic Markov process X t with jumps that are governed by a jump measure with the generalized lack of memory property described above. See [2,8] for similar models.…”
Section: A Growth Collapse Process With Generalized Memoryless Jumpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 3.2. The mean of the first passage time T x (y) for a Markovian growth-collapse process has been studied in detail, see Löpker and Stadje (2011). Meanwhile, formula (3.3) presents the explicit representation of the distribution (in the special case of two-state processes with exponentially distributed jumps).…”
Section: And B I Are Given Bymentioning
confidence: 99%