2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep35968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric phase coded metasurface: from polarization dependent directive electromagnetic wave scattering to diffusion-like scattering

Abstract: Ultrathin metasurface compromising various sub-wavelength meta-particles offers promising advantages in controlling electromagnetic wave by spatially manipulating the wavefront characteristics across the interface. The recently proposed digital coding metasurface could even simplify the design and optimization procedures due to the digitalization of the meta-particle geometry. However, current attempts to implement the digital metasurface still utilize several structural meta-particles to obtain certain electr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It calculates the radiation far field by the equivalent currents technique using the aperture field method, [37] and the required compensation phase ϕ ij for each unit cell ijth of a reflectarray can be computed by using the following formula: [38] In virtue of different paths from the incident wave of the feed to the metasurface, the reflection phase of each unit cell is different.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It calculates the radiation far field by the equivalent currents technique using the aperture field method, [37] and the required compensation phase ϕ ij for each unit cell ijth of a reflectarray can be computed by using the following formula: [38] In virtue of different paths from the incident wave of the feed to the metasurface, the reflection phase of each unit cell is different.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[37,38] However, such anisotropic coding elements have a fixed phase difference (e.g., 180°) under the orthogonal polarizations to reach dual functionalities. [37,38] However, such anisotropic coding elements have a fixed phase difference (e.g., 180°) under the orthogonal polarizations to reach dual functionalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Figure 12. The standard deviations for the field uniformity of the test zone, which loaded the rotatable 1-bit random coding diffusion metasurface in the RC, and the purple lines are the tolerance requirements for the standard deviation of scalability of these coding metasurfaces to frequencies in the range of THz or optical is possible, allowing for the controllability of reflection, and scattering of EM waves in these frequency domains [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen the reflection phase is continuous and there is about 180 o ±27 o phase difference between x-and y-polarized reflections between 14.1 GHz and 23.3 GHz. According to PB phase theory [9], [23], if the unit cell has a high reflection magnitude under LP wave illumination with around 180 o reflection phase difference between orthogonal linearly x-and y-polarized incidences. Then when the unit cell is illuminated by a CP wave the cross-pol reflection will be significantly reduced, leading to high co-pol reflection.…”
Section: Pb Meta-atom Designmentioning
confidence: 99%