Springer Series in Computational Mathematics 2006
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-30666-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric Numerical Integration

Abstract: The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
150
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
150
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(19) and (20) with the potential variation between the electrode surface and the axis taken into account. Thus, the rms uncertainty in the measurement of the longitudinal energy, W ∥e , is …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(19) and (20) with the potential variation between the electrode surface and the axis taken into account. Thus, the rms uncertainty in the measurement of the longitudinal energy, W ∥e , is …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 The trajectory of the electron in these realistic field maps was obtained by integrating the equations of motion using an 8-stage symplectic implicit integrator. 19 Figure 1 shows the trajectory of an electron obtained by such a simulation.…”
Section: Verification By Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we are applying a symplectic method ψ to a Hamiltonian ODEż = f (z) in extended phase space with Hamiltonian K, we can apply the result from [16,Theorem IX.3.1], showing that the modified equation is also Hamiltonian, and has Hamiltoniañ…”
Section: Corollary 2 Symplectic Partitioned Runge-kutta (Sprk) Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of devising numerical methods which are themselves symplectic maps goes back into the previous century, some early references are [9,27]. The monographs by Hairer et al [16], and Leimkuhler and Reich [22] may be consulted for an extensive treatment. Such numerical methods are called symplectic integrators and their success is often explained through the well known fact that any symplectic map can be identified as the exact flow of a local, perturbed Hamiltonian problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To circumvent the limitations of standard time integration schemes, several general methods for conservative or dissipative ODEs such as orthogonal projection [29, Section IV.4] and relaxation [33,52,55] as well as more problem-dependent methods for dissipative ODEs such as artificial dissipation or filtering [28,40,63] have been proposed, mainly in the context of one-step methods. For fluid mechanics applications, orthogonal projection methods are not really suitable since they do not preserve linear invariants such as the total mass, [29]. In contrast, relaxation methods conserve all linear invariants and can still preserve the correct global entropy conservation/dissipation in time [33,51,52,55].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%