2017
DOI: 10.1002/2016sw001501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geomagnetically induced currents: Science, engineering, and applications readiness

Abstract: This paper is the primary deliverable of the very first NASA Living With a Star Institute Working Group, Geomagnetically Induced Currents (GIC) Working Group. The paper provides a broad overview of the current status and future challenges pertaining to the science, engineering, and applications of the GIC problem. Science is understood here as the basic space and Earth sciences research that allows improved understanding and physics‐based modeling of the physical processes behind GIC. Engineering, in turn, is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
168
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
168
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The great geomagnetic storm of May 1921 produced extreme geophysical conditions, in particular large geoelectric fields (~10 V/km) in several parts of the world. Such large fields are a major concern today because of their potential to impact contemporary technologies such the transmission of electrical power (Pulkkinen et al, ), railway track circuits (Krausmann et al, ), and cathodic protection systems for pipelines (Gummow, ). The May 1921 storm therefore provides a well‐documented historical example that can inform future decisions on the risk that space weather poses to such systems, taking account of how regional differences in the value and complexity of ground conductivity may decrease or increase the risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The great geomagnetic storm of May 1921 produced extreme geophysical conditions, in particular large geoelectric fields (~10 V/km) in several parts of the world. Such large fields are a major concern today because of their potential to impact contemporary technologies such the transmission of electrical power (Pulkkinen et al, ), railway track circuits (Krausmann et al, ), and cathodic protection systems for pipelines (Gummow, ). The May 1921 storm therefore provides a well‐documented historical example that can inform future decisions on the risk that space weather poses to such systems, taking account of how regional differences in the value and complexity of ground conductivity may decrease or increase the risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The derivative of the geomagnetic field, DER‐H, shows also strong disturbances at those timing when UPC‐H signal is also stronger, indicating an association with substorm activity. The derivative of the geomagnetic field is usually a good proxy for GICs, and consequently for disruption of technology (Boteler & Pirjola, ; Pulkkinen et al, ; Trichtchenko & Boteler, ; Viljanen et al, ). This has important consequences for space weather purposes, as these local and strong changes of the geomagnetic field have occurred at midlatitude locations and are associated with substorm activity, something unusual and unexpected at these locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition was chosen to investigate the horizontal field fluctuations (i.e., components tangent to the Earth's surface), which are associated with GIC hazards (Pulkkinen et al, ; Viljanen et al, ). A simple forward‐difference method was used to obtain derivatives; this simple approximation is adequate for the given time resolution (Tóth et al, ).…”
Section: Current Validation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of interest is d B /d t , or the rate of change of the magnetic field as measured on the Earth's surface. This value is especially relevant to geomagnetically induced currents (GICs), which are currents driven through long, ground‐based conductors during geomagnetically active periods (Pirjola, ; Pulkkinen et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%