2014
DOI: 10.3133/ofr20121024j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geologic framework for the national assessment of carbon dioxide storage resources: Williston Basin, Central Montana Basins, and Montana Thrust Belt study areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To characterize the CPG power plant model, we assumed that all CPG power plants were constructed so they use the Winnepegosis sedimentary basin geothermal resource, which underlies the area near Rugby. The Winnepegosis basin is large (i.e., 11-million acre formation with the potential to sequester 60 GtCO 2 ) and we assumed homogeneous subsurface reservoir properties of 3.05 km depth, 275 m thickness, 10 mD permeability, and a temperature of 117 ∘ C, based on a geologic temperature gradient of 35 ∘ C/km and a 10 ∘ C mean annual surface temperature [37].…”
Section: Capacity Factors Of Co 2 Plume Geothermal (Cpg) Power Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize the CPG power plant model, we assumed that all CPG power plants were constructed so they use the Winnepegosis sedimentary basin geothermal resource, which underlies the area near Rugby. The Winnepegosis basin is large (i.e., 11-million acre formation with the potential to sequester 60 GtCO 2 ) and we assumed homogeneous subsurface reservoir properties of 3.05 km depth, 275 m thickness, 10 mD permeability, and a temperature of 117 ∘ C, based on a geologic temperature gradient of 35 ∘ C/km and a 10 ∘ C mean annual surface temperature [37].…”
Section: Capacity Factors Of Co 2 Plume Geothermal (Cpg) Power Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%