Geoheritage 2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809531-7.00018-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geoheritage and Geoparks

Abstract: This chapter was originally published in the book Geoheritage, published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author's benefit and for the benefit of the author's institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who know you, and providing a copy to your institution's administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of the focus in geoconservation over the last few decades, particularly in Europe, has centered on the protection of geosites primarily for scientific and educational reasons [2]. At the same time there has been growing recognition of the cultural and aesthetic values of geoheritage especially in relation to the development of geotourism [3][4][5][6][7][8] and UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) Global Geoparks which are required to deliver a range of educational, economic, cultural and social benefits as well as geoconservation [9,10]. Geotourism emerged in the 1990s [11,12] to promote wider awareness of geoheritage and its values beyond the geoscience community as a means to gain support for geoconservation at a time when sustainable development and eco-or nature-based tourism were attracting increasing attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the focus in geoconservation over the last few decades, particularly in Europe, has centered on the protection of geosites primarily for scientific and educational reasons [2]. At the same time there has been growing recognition of the cultural and aesthetic values of geoheritage especially in relation to the development of geotourism [3][4][5][6][7][8] and UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) Global Geoparks which are required to deliver a range of educational, economic, cultural and social benefits as well as geoconservation [9,10]. Geotourism emerged in the 1990s [11,12] to promote wider awareness of geoheritage and its values beyond the geoscience community as a means to gain support for geoconservation at a time when sustainable development and eco-or nature-based tourism were attracting increasing attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pengembangan potensi wisata di Kabupaten Belitung Timur difokuskan pada pembangunan desa wisata, hal tersebut bertujuan untuk mengangkat dan melindungi nilai-nilai budaya, agama, adat istiadat, optimalisasi potensi ekonomi dan karakteristik daerah. Mengingat pilar dasar dari geopark adalah keragaman geologi, keragaman hayati, dan keragaman budaya (Brilha, 2018; Ólafsdóttir dan Dowling,2014; UNESCO, 2016).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…These wider values are explicit in the publication of Scotland 's Geodiversity Charter (Scottish Geodiversity Forum 2017b). They have also been recognised at an international level, for example by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) in its resolutions and protected area guidelines (Dudley 2008;IUCN 2008IUCN , 2012Crofts & Gordon 2015), in the activities of ProGEO, the European Association for the Conservation of the Geological Heritage (http://www.progeo.se/) and by the growth of the UNESCO Global Geoparks Network (Larwood et al 2013;UNESCO 2016;Brilha 2018b). Hence, while scientific value remains the fundamental basis for GCR site assessment, the case for geoconservation is now founded on a broader base than science alone.…”
Section: The Wider Values Of Geoheritage and Geoconservationmentioning
confidence: 99%