Geographical differences in perinatal health and child welfare in the Netherlands: rationale for the healthy pregnancy 4 all-2 program

Abstract

BackgroundGeographical inequalities in perinatal health and child welfare require attention. To improve the identification, and care, of mothers and young children at risk of adverse health outcomes, the HP4All-2 program was developed. The program consists of three studies, focusing on creating a continuum for risk selection and tailored care pathways from preconception and antenatal care towards 1) postpartum care, 2) early childhood care, as well as 3) interconception care. The program has been implemented in ten municipalities in the Netherlands, aiming to target communities with a relatively disadvantageous position with regard to perinatal and child health outcomes. To delineate the position of the ten participating municipalities, we present municipal and regional differences in the prevalence of perinatal mortality, perinatal morbidity, children living in deprived neighbourhoods, and children living in families on welfare.MethodsData on all singleton births in the Netherlands between 2009 and 2014 were analysed for the prevalence of perinatal mortality and morbidity. In addition, national data on children living in deprived neighbourhoods and children living in families on welfare between 2009 and 2012 were analysed. The prevalence of these outcomes were calculated and ranked for 62 geographical areas, the 50 largest municipalities and the 12 provinces, to determine the position of the municipalities that participate in HP4All-2.ResultsConsiderable geographical differences were present for all four outcomes. The municipalities that participate in HP4All-2 are among the 25 municipalities with the highest prevalence of perinatal mortality, perinatal morbidity, children living in deprived neighbourhoods, or children in families on welfare.ConclusionThis study illustrates geographical differences in perinatal health and/or child welfare outcomes and demonstrates that the HP4All-2 program targets municipalities with a relative unfavourable position. By targeting these municipalities, the program is expected to contribute most to improving the care for young children and their mothers at risk, and hence to reducing their risks and health inequalities.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1425-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Persisting inequalities in birth outcomes related to neighbourhood deprivation

“…Apart from strategies to improve birth outcomes in the general population, policies targeting the most deprived sectors of the population were also made available in this period. Also, multiple intervention programmes to improve perinatal health were launched with a general focus on vulnerable populations 34 35. As found in previous studies,36 maternal smoking is an important contributor to inequalities in birth outcomes.…”

Did an urban perinatal health programme in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, reduce adverse perinatal outcomes? Register-based retrospective cohort study

“…Epidemiological evidence of inequalities in adverse pregnancy outcomes is compelling enough to justify continued efforts to develop a healthcare system that can properly deal with social risk factors. It is advised to evaluate such a system when it has been brought to scale and matured sufficiently to have a discernible impact 31. The Ready for a Baby programme generated a lot of attention both locally and nationally for the relevance of social determinants of pregnancy outcomes and for the development of methods to integrate obstetric care and the social domain, which is a valuable outcome in itself.…”

Innovative postnatal risk assessment in preventive child health Care: A study protocol

“…The study will be executed in three municipalities in the Netherlands; Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and Dordrecht. All three are included in the ranking of high perinatal mortality, high prematurity and high SGA rates, and high frequencies of children living in deprivation (Waelput, 2017). All newborns in these municipalities, aged 0–8 weeks of age, will be eligible for inclusion in this study, during a maximum of 18 months.…”