2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-019-02109-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographic and genetic variation in susceptibility of Butomus umbellatus to foliar fungal pathogens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For invaders with multiple introduced genotypes, determining how environmental variation contributes to their success, and whether the response to the environment varies by genotype, can improve predictions about which invaders (or genotypes) will become invasive (i.e., using a trait‐based approach; Bhattarai et al, 2017 ; Davidson et al, 2011 ; Weinig et al, 2007 ) and guide decision‐making around management actions (Gaskin et al, 2011 ; Thum, 2018 ). There are a growing number of invaders for which it is clear that management should be tailored at the subspecific level (Blossey & Casagrande, 2016 ; Croy et al, 2020 ; Harms, Shearer, et al, 2020 ; Harms, Williams, & Purcell, 2021 ), and this work further supports continuation of that research direction. How genotypes of introduced species differ in their tolerance or response to environmental variation is key to distinguishing invasive traits, and thus modeling their distribution and impacts in the invaded range.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For invaders with multiple introduced genotypes, determining how environmental variation contributes to their success, and whether the response to the environment varies by genotype, can improve predictions about which invaders (or genotypes) will become invasive (i.e., using a trait‐based approach; Bhattarai et al, 2017 ; Davidson et al, 2011 ; Weinig et al, 2007 ) and guide decision‐making around management actions (Gaskin et al, 2011 ; Thum, 2018 ). There are a growing number of invaders for which it is clear that management should be tailored at the subspecific level (Blossey & Casagrande, 2016 ; Croy et al, 2020 ; Harms, Shearer, et al, 2020 ; Harms, Williams, & Purcell, 2021 ), and this work further supports continuation of that research direction. How genotypes of introduced species differ in their tolerance or response to environmental variation is key to distinguishing invasive traits, and thus modeling their distribution and impacts in the invaded range.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Butomus umbellatus establishment and spread in North American aquatic habitats has generated negative ecological and economic impacts, leading to increased interest in predicting invasiveness, potential distribution (Banerjee et al, in prep), and development of effective management tools for the species [59,70,71]. However, research on B. umbellatus management has largely failed to take into account genetic variation and the implications of differences in ploidy in the invaded range (but see [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As demonstrated here and elsewhere, genetic variability in invasive species may be sufficient to generate patterns where some areas are more prone to invasion than others. In North America, B. umbellatus is represented by several genotypes within two cytotypes which vary in a number of important traits, including pathogen susceptibility [59], nutrient response [86], and competitive ability (this study). Future research into ecosystem impacts or to develop effective management strategies for B. umbellatus should take this variability into account.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Polyploids exhibit improvement such as adaptivity to abiotic stress, e.g. drought (del Pozo and Ramirez-Parra, 2014;Martínez et al, 2018), cold (Klatt et al, 2018), heat (Godfree et al, 2017), salt (Chao et al, 2013), and light (Coate et al, 2013), biotic-stress tolerance e.g., against pathogen (Keane et al, 2014;Hannweg et al, 2016;Hias et al, 2017), against competitors (Wu et al, 2019;Harms et al, 2020), in mutualistic interaction photosynthesis efficiency (Anneberg and Segraves, 2019;Acuña-Rodríguez et al, 2020), metabolite alternation (Iannicelli et al, 2020), and reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging (Deng et al, 2012;Wei et al, 2019). Polyploidy also influences plant reproduction and fitness, especially apomixis, i.e., the asexual reproduction via seed (Asker and Jerling, 1992).…”
Section: Polyploidymentioning
confidence: 99%