Regional Geology and Tectonics: Phanerozoic Passive Margins, Cratonic Basins and Global Tectonic Maps 2012
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-56357-6.00022-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geodynamic interpretation of the Cape and Karoo basins, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These features suggest that the subsidence of the southern Kaapvaal craton may not be intrinsically driven, but instead extrinsic, that is, by flexural loading from nearby subduction (cf. Tankard et al, 2012). This inference is also consistent with the high Mg# of mantle xenoliths entrained in kimberlites which were erupted after the basin subsidence (Griffin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Implication For Other Cratons With Sedimentary Basinssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These features suggest that the subsidence of the southern Kaapvaal craton may not be intrinsically driven, but instead extrinsic, that is, by flexural loading from nearby subduction (cf. Tankard et al, 2012). This inference is also consistent with the high Mg# of mantle xenoliths entrained in kimberlites which were erupted after the basin subsidence (Griffin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Implication For Other Cratons With Sedimentary Basinssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Some cratons like the Kaapvaal Craton, though accepting sediments, are not at the center of subsidence. The sedimentation thins towards the interior of the Kaapvaal craton and thickens towards the adjacent orogenic belt (Tankard et al, 2012) (Figures 2 and 6). These features suggest that the subsidence of the southern Kaapvaal craton may not be intrinsically driven, but instead extrinsic, that is, by flexural loading from nearby subduction (cf.…”
Section: Implication For Other Cratons With Sedimentary Basinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, ; Turner ; Tankard et al . , ; Lindeque et al . ), but the most prevalent is the reciprocal‐foreland basin model proposed by Catuneanu et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These areas of greater subsidence were infilled by progressively lower gradient clinothems as sedimentation outpaced subsidence. The differential subsidence in the early basin fill may have been related to the configuration of pre‐existing basement fault blocks (Tankard et al., ). However, the subsidence responsible for the increased accumulation of sand on the shelf during the later accretion‐dominated phase could also be related to initiation of flexural loading, as the Karoo Basin transitioned into its well documented retro‐arc foreland basin setting (De Wit & Ransome, ; López‐Gamundí & Rossello, ; Veevers et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Karoo Basin has traditionally been interpreted as a retro‐arc foreland basin, developed inboard of the Cape Fold Belt, in response to the northward subduction of the Panthalassan (palaeo‐Pacific) plate beneath the Gondwana plate (De Wit & Ransome, ; López‐Gamundí & Rossello, ; Veevers, Cole, & Cowan, ). However, recent radiometric dating (Blewett and Phillips, ) and tectonostratigraphic analyses (Tankard, Welsink, Aukes, Newton, & Stettler, , ) support a Triassic age for the development of the Cape Fold Belt. Subsidence during the Permian pre‐foreland basin stage has been attributed to dynamic topography (mantle flow) associated with the subducting plate, with variable foundering of basement blocks (Pysklywec & Mitrovica, ; Tankard et al., ).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%