2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-012-0765-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geodetic deformation monitoring of Ataturk Dam in Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are also compatible, as with the results for embankment dams in these studies (Manake and Kulkarni 2002;Kalkan 2014;Kalkan et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results are also compatible, as with the results for embankment dams in these studies (Manake and Kulkarni 2002;Kalkan 2014;Kalkan et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Accuracy, cost, and automation are the important factors that need to be considered in dam deformation monitoring. The traditional monitoring methods, such as total station, level, and theodolite, did not allow the real-time, continuous and automatic monitoring of dam [3]; GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) has been used for the surface deformation monitoring of the engineering structure based on its highprecision and high-automation characteristics [4][5][6] but with higher cost of geodetic receivers severely limiting its application in the dam deformation monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, not like the traditional GNSS multiantenna technology, the dual-channel RF front-end and digital correlator share the same clock module, avoiding cycle slip error and realizing singleepoch positioning, owing to electronic component reduction of clock-synchronized dual-antenna receivers, the newgeneration N71JN from Shanghai Huace Navigation Technology Ltd. in Figure 1, which has low cost (<$1565) and light (<3.6 kg). Moreover, most of the dam GNSS surface monitoring schemes are unreasonable, and GNSS monitoring station overabundance results in tremendous waste of equipment resources [4,6,10,12,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, many studies were conducted concerning monitoring structural responses of dams, specifically, earth dams (Guler et al 2006;Bayrak 2008;Gikas & Sakellariou 2008a;Ehiorobo & Ehigiator 2011;Kalkan 2014) and concrete dams (Pytharouli & Stiros 2005;Sortis & Paoliani 2007) on the bases of geodetic and geotechnical methods. Guler et al (2006) evaluated the surface movements of Alibey Earth Dam (Istanbul) by means of geodetic and geotechnical methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that overall movement of the embankment occurred in the SW direction due to the hydrostatic pressure from the dam reservoir. Kalkan (2014) determined the magnitude and direction of radial deformations of the Ataturk Dam, the largest dam in Turkey. Additionally, though not significant, the correlation between the radial movements in embankments areas and the reservoir water level was investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%