Geochemistry of the Sandstones of Punagarh Basin: Implications for Two Source Terranes and Arabian - Nubian Connection of Aravalli Craton?

Abstract

Sandstones of Punagarh basin of Trans Aravalli region, NW Indian shield were analyzed for their major and trace element contents in conjunction with petrographic modes. The Punagarh basin comprises four formations (Sojat, Bambolai, Khamal and Sowania), amongst which the Sojat Formation in uncoformable contact with overlying formations, is significantly older and enjoys separate status as rest of the formations constitute Punagarh Group. Petrographic attributes suggest that Sojat sandstones contain distinct modal abundances like high content of quartz and low content of feldspar, mica, matrix, rock fragments and cement. In general there is a decrease in the average modal abundance of quartz and mica with concomitant increase of feldspar, chert and rock fragments from base to top in Punagarh sandstones. Sojat sandstones are also geochemically distinct as they possess high SiO2/Al2O3, Th/U and Cr/Th ratios coupled with lowest Na2O/K2O ratio and Zr content, least fractionated LREE, more fractionated HREE and largest Eu* anomaly compared to Punagarh sandstones. The weathering indices suggest intense chemical weathering for Sojat sandstones and low to moderate for Punagarh sandstones. Compositionally all the sandstones of the Punagarh basin come under the category of quartzarenite. Compared to PAAS and UCC, both suite of sandstones are generally depleted in REE, HFSE (with exception of Zr, Hf and Ta), and enriched in ferromagnesian trace elements particularly Cr and Co. The chemical data indicate that the sediments were derived from the source(s) of mixed felsic - mafic composition, with the former being dominant. The source rocks were granites, TTG, basalts, and rhyolites. The Sojat sandstones owe their source form Archean crust while Punagarh sandstones got detritus from Mesoproterozic crust. Immobile element ratios and REE abundances of Sojat sandstones closely match with Paleoproterozoic metagreywackes of Ghana of African craton while Punagarh sandstones show near geochemical characteristic with Gogunda, Kumbalgarh and Vindhyan quartzites of Aravalli craton. This geochemical similarity of Sojat sandstones provides credence to the hypothesis that Trans – Aravalli region of India had been an integral part of Arabian - Nubian shield. The chemical data advocate the deposition of these sandstones in a tectonic setting comparable to modern back arc setting.

Sedimentological and petrochemical studies of Jurassic clastic rocks, Habo Dome Basin, Kachchh Mainland, Northwest India: Implications for depositional environment, provenance, and tectonic setting

“…The felsic–intermediate–mafic nature as adduced from the UCC normalized diagram (Figure ) is well corroborated by the ratios of various immobile incompatible to compatible element pairs, such as Th/Sc, Th/Co, Zr/Sc, and La/Sc, (e.g. Cullers, ; Fatima & Khan, ; Khan & Khan, ; Raza et al, ; Taylor & McLennan, ; Tran, Ansdell, Bethune, Watters, & Shton, ; Wang, Zhou, Yan, & Li, ). The range and average values of these ratios in the calstic rocks of the Habo Dome Basin advocate for a predominantly felsic source mixed with mafic ingredient (Table ).…”

Geochemistry of the Palaeoproterozoic quartzites of Lower Cuddapah Supergroup, South India: Implications for the palaeoweathering, provenance, and crustal evolution

“…The arc diminished early due to westward migration of the subduction and accretion of oceanic island arc to the rifted margin of proto‐India (Vijaya Kumar, Leelanandam, & Ernst, ). Presence of relatively large number of volcanic lithic fragments and intermediate level of TTEs (i.e., higher than the sediments derived exclusively from crustal rocks but lower than the sediments owing arc protolith) in the Gulcheru Quartzites suggest supply of sediments from dual source terrain and their deposition in a back‐arc setting (Condie & Wronkiewicz, ; Fatima & Khan, ; Khan & Khan, ). Closure of the back‐arc basins and extinction of magmatic arc took place immediately after their maturity (Vijaya Kumar et al, ).…”

Provenance and Tectonic Setting of Lower Cretaceous Huanhe Formation Sandstones, Northwest Ordos Basin, North-Central China

“…In recent years, various exceptional remarkable achievements have been made in recognising the geotectonic background throughout the formation of rocks, the provenance of the basin and the tectonic background of the provenance area, providing a new perspective for understanding the evolution of the basin and its source area [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Detrital mineralogy and geochemical characteristics of siliciclastic sediments will effectively reveal the provenance area, tectonic settings, transportation, paleoweathering conditions of the source area, and also establish a basis for understanding paleoclimate and diagenesis [9][10][11][12].…”