2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemical evaluation of observed changes in volcanic activity during the 2007 eruption at Stromboli (Italy)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that both Km3 and HOT stations are located in tectonically active areas rich in submarine volcanoes, the geothermal origins appear to be the most likely. However, we have not found evidence for other chemolithotrophic energy generation mechanisms in the same screening, while CO is considered a rather minor product of geothermal emissions (33,41). More data from other oceanic regions with more stable geologic settings might help prove this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Considering that both Km3 and HOT stations are located in tectonically active areas rich in submarine volcanoes, the geothermal origins appear to be the most likely. However, we have not found evidence for other chemolithotrophic energy generation mechanisms in the same screening, while CO is considered a rather minor product of geothermal emissions (33,41). More data from other oceanic regions with more stable geologic settings might help prove this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…On 27 February 2007, the "normal" Strombolian activity was interrupted by a new effusive phase that lasted several weeks, finishing on 2 April of that year (Rizzo et al 2009). During this effusive period, a paroxysmal event occurred on 15 March at which time the pyroclastic materials ejected reached the village of Stromboli.…”
Section: Stromboli Volcanomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The δ 13 C and CO 2 /SO 2 ratios are powerful tracers of magma degassing at Mount Etna volcano, Italy (e.g., Aiuppa et al, 2007Aiuppa et al, , 2010Paonita et al, 2012) and in many other volcanic systems worldwide (e.g., Stromboli, Italy: Capasso et al, 2005;Aiuppa et al, 2009;Rizzo et al, 2009; Turrialba, Costa Rica: Moussallam et al, 2014). While high-frequency measurements of the CO 2 /SO 2 ratio have revealed this to be a powerful tracer for detecting pre-eruptive degassing of ascending magmas (e.g., Aiuppa et al, 2007;Shinohara et al, 2008;Patané et al, 2013), δ 13 C is currently only monitored in fumarolic gases via discrete sampling, and so only provides medium-to long-term clues about the dynamics occurring at depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%