1983
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2541(83)90035-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geochemical aspects of the evolution and mineralization of the Amo Younger Granite Complex (northern Nigeria)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may had been associated with high volatile contents. IMEOKPARIA (1983IMEOKPARIA ( , 1985 and BOWDEN (1982) conclude for other peralkaline granites that residual hydrothermal fluids autometasomatised the solidified granites and obliterated primary magmatic geochemical patterns. The wide range of Rb/Sr values within such small stocks and bosses as present at Umberatana cannot be due to crystal fractionation.…”
Section: Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This may had been associated with high volatile contents. IMEOKPARIA (1983IMEOKPARIA ( , 1985 and BOWDEN (1982) conclude for other peralkaline granites that residual hydrothermal fluids autometasomatised the solidified granites and obliterated primary magmatic geochemical patterns. The wide range of Rb/Sr values within such small stocks and bosses as present at Umberatana cannot be due to crystal fractionation.…”
Section: Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(1979). whereas data for A-type granites from Nigeria are those of Imeokparia (1983). Note that for the most pan, the Dokhan-Qattar rocks resemble the Andean granites, and are clearly distinct from the within-plate Nigerian granites (Pearce 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(1979). whereas data for A-type granites from Nigeria are those of Imeokparia (1983). Note that for the most pan, the Dokhan-Qattar rocks resemble the Andean granites, and are clearly distinct from the within-plate Nigerian granites Note that the data plot mostly in the field of arc-related lavas; note that the latter field is not accurately traced in Figure 1 of Stem and Gottfried (1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations