2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geo-spatial grid-based transformations of precipitation estimates using spatial interpolation methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Many techniques are available to interpolate precipitation data set. The inverse distance weighting (IDW) and Kriging method have been widely applied for the spatial predication of precipitation (Watkins et al 2005;Szolgay et al 2009;Hussain et al 2010;Teegavarapu et al 2012). We use the Kriging method because it can provide more accurate estimates of precipitation during the growing season than the IDW method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many techniques are available to interpolate precipitation data set. The inverse distance weighting (IDW) and Kriging method have been widely applied for the spatial predication of precipitation (Watkins et al 2005;Szolgay et al 2009;Hussain et al 2010;Teegavarapu et al 2012). We use the Kriging method because it can provide more accurate estimates of precipitation during the growing season than the IDW method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements were achieved in the estimation of precipitation data when the stations with lowest measurement uncertainty were selected in the interpolation process. Teegavarapu et al (2011) evaluated spatial interpolation methods for transformation of precipitation estimates from one grid to another. These methods use extents of spatial overlays as weights in nearest neighbour interpolation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is most often applied as a precursor to creating contour or isoline plots, the drawing of equal value lines to produce a realistic surface between measurement points [16,17].…”
Section: Interpolation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-validation was used to verify the accuracy of the different interpolation methods. To evaluate the goodness-of-fi t, we calculated the mean absolute error (MAE), the mean relative error (MRE), and the root mean square error (RMSE) [3,16,28]. The MRE represents the percentage of error between the observed and predicted values, while the RMSE and MAE summarize the mean difference in the units of observed and predicted values [3].…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%