2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-016-5956-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geo-environmental suitability assessment for agricultural land in the rural–urban fringe using BPNN and GIS: a case study of Hangzhou

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values for the physiographic compartmentalization were established according to the different vulnerabilities and characteristics of each unit and its potential to geological processes, such as mass movements, linear erosion and floods, associated with the respective slope values found in each one, as well as indications of the surface dynamics processes identified in the aerial image analysis and field investigations. In this context, several authors, such as Feizizadeh and Blaschke (2013), Elsheikh et al (2015), Kong et al (2016) and Ross (2006) have been using physiographic criteria and presence of surface dynamics processes as hierarchical parameters to obtain maps of environmental susceptibility and geo-environmental zoning, in which the method to overlay variables, such as slope, altimetry and geological units and geomorphological data, are selected as indicators for obtaining homogeneous units that synthesize their main potentialities and implications.…”
Section: Geo-environmental Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values for the physiographic compartmentalization were established according to the different vulnerabilities and characteristics of each unit and its potential to geological processes, such as mass movements, linear erosion and floods, associated with the respective slope values found in each one, as well as indications of the surface dynamics processes identified in the aerial image analysis and field investigations. In this context, several authors, such as Feizizadeh and Blaschke (2013), Elsheikh et al (2015), Kong et al (2016) and Ross (2006) have been using physiographic criteria and presence of surface dynamics processes as hierarchical parameters to obtain maps of environmental susceptibility and geo-environmental zoning, in which the method to overlay variables, such as slope, altimetry and geological units and geomorphological data, are selected as indicators for obtaining homogeneous units that synthesize their main potentialities and implications.…”
Section: Geo-environmental Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientists have done many studies on evaluating land suitability; in the 1960s, land suitability evaluation was the main basis for urban planning [29], and since the 1970s GIS techniques have encouraged the development of land suitability evaluation [24,25,[30][31][32][33][34][35]. Catching up with new advances in the technologies of data collection and processing, the land suitability technique is applied in various fields including crop suitability evaluation [36][37][38][39][40], landscape planning and hazards [41,42], water management and planning [43][44][45], evaluation of the environmental impacts [46,47], evaluation of land uses [48][49][50], and sustainable urban development [51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015, Jiang X et al proposed a common comprehensive index method and a new support vector machine (SVM) model, and compared them to evaluate the geological environment quality of mining [2]. Kong C et al presented an integrated technique using back-propagation neural network (BPNN) and geographic information system (GIS) to assess suitability for agricultural land based on geo-environmental factors in the rural-urban fringe [3]; Chen X et al used the weights-of-evidence method based on ArcGIS to evaluate the sensitivity of debris flow in Kangding County [4]. In 2017, Du Qian et al used a combination of Logistic regression and information model to evaluate the landslide susceptibility [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%