1973
DOI: 10.1093/aesa/66.2.302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genus Pediculochelus (Acarina: Pediculochelidae), with Notes on P. raulti and Descriptions of Two New Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pediculochelus Lavoipierre, 1946. Type species: Pediculochelus raulti Lavoipierre, 1946;Price, 1973. Paralycus nortoni sp. nov. Gnathosoma (Figs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pediculochelus Lavoipierre, 1946. Type species: Pediculochelus raulti Lavoipierre, 1946;Price, 1973. Paralycus nortoni sp. nov. Gnathosoma (Figs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The known species of Paralycus are described from soil, bees, Auricularia sp., lily fruits, and Coccinella septempunctata. Among them, two species are described as phoretic mites: P. parasiti and P. raulti (Berlese, 1905;Lavoipierre, 1946;Price, 1973;Fan et al 1996;Zhang and Li, 2001). Despite of being collected from the barks of beetle-infested pines, the new mite species P. nortoni sp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All known species lack males, possibly indicating a long-term maintenance of asexual reproduction [3]. Pediculochelids are found in the soil [2][3][4][5][6][7][8], on bees [4,9,10], and rarely in other habitats [4,[11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a species belonging to Pediculochelidae had been described earlier as Alicus pyrigerus Berlese, 1905 in family Alycidae [5]. For this species, Womersley (1944) [16] proposed a new genus, Paralycus (based on the differences in the body shape and bothridial setae), thus making Pediculochelus a junior synonym [3,4]; however, as per ICZN rules, this did not affect the validity of the family name Pediculochelidae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%