2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotypic characterization and antimicrobial resistance of Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from milk, dairy products, and humans with respect to inhibitory activity of a probiotic Lactobacillus rhamenosus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
6
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
6
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Though the ampicillin resistance in this study was 56.7%, it was the antibiotics to which the isolates from this study were most resistant. Higher levels of cephalosporin resistance were also reported previously 19,20 compared to findings from our research. Lei et al 17 revealed that isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime and cefotaxime, signifying third-generation cephalosporins effective toward V. parahaemolyticus infections.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Though the ampicillin resistance in this study was 56.7%, it was the antibiotics to which the isolates from this study were most resistant. Higher levels of cephalosporin resistance were also reported previously 19,20 compared to findings from our research. Lei et al 17 revealed that isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime and cefotaxime, signifying third-generation cephalosporins effective toward V. parahaemolyticus infections.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Resistance to ampicillin was reportedly higher among Vibrio species 2,18 compared to those from our study. Ampicillin and ampicillin-sulbactam resistance (100%) reported previously 9,20,23 contradicted ours. The possible rationale for lower ampicillin resistance could be attributed to the different food types, and the hygiene studied.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations