2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2014.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotype rotation for leaf anthracnose disease management in sorghum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of resistant cultivars (Casela, Frederiksen, & Ferreira, ; Casela & Frederiksen, ; Moore, Ditmore, & Tebeest, ; Chala et al., ; Costa et al., ) and fungicide application (Costa et al., ; Cota, Costa, Silva, & Lanza, ; Resende, Rodrigues, Costa, & Silva, ) are the primary measures for controlling anthracnose in sorghum. Besides these, mixture of genotypes (Guimarães et al., ; Silva et al., ), rotation of cultivars (Silva et al., ), dynamic multiline population approach (Costa, Zambolim, Silva, Cota, & Casela, ) and pyramids of genes (Casela et al., ) are additional strategies to increase the durability of sorghum resistance to C . sublineolum .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The use of resistant cultivars (Casela, Frederiksen, & Ferreira, ; Casela & Frederiksen, ; Moore, Ditmore, & Tebeest, ; Chala et al., ; Costa et al., ) and fungicide application (Costa et al., ; Cota, Costa, Silva, & Lanza, ; Resende, Rodrigues, Costa, & Silva, ) are the primary measures for controlling anthracnose in sorghum. Besides these, mixture of genotypes (Guimarães et al., ; Silva et al., ), rotation of cultivars (Silva et al., ), dynamic multiline population approach (Costa, Zambolim, Silva, Cota, & Casela, ) and pyramids of genes (Casela et al., ) are additional strategies to increase the durability of sorghum resistance to C . sublineolum .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of resistant cultivars (Casela, Frederiksen, & Ferreira, 1993;Casela & Frederiksen, 1994;Moore, Ditmore, & Tebeest, 2008;Chala et al, 2011;Costa et al, 2011) and fungicide application (Costa et al, 2009;Cota, Costa, Silva, & Lanza, 2011;Resende, Rodrigues, Costa, & Silva, 2013) are the primary measures for controlling anthracnose in sorghum. Besides these, mixture of genotypes (Guimarães et al, 1998;Silva et al, 2015), rotation of cultivars , dynamic multiline population approach (Costa, Zambolim, Silva, Cota, & Casela, 2012) and pyramids of genes are additional strategies to increase the durability of sorghum resistance to C. sublineolum. In Brazil, a preventive fungicide application is recommended whenever susceptible genotypes are planted and the environmental conditions are favourable to the development of the disease (Costa et al, 2009;Cota et al, 2011;Resende et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anthracnose can be controlled using different options including fungicides, cultural practices such as weed and residue management, planting disease free seeds and crop rotation and host resistance (Mathur 2002;Erpelding and Prom 2004;Chala et al, 2010;Silva et al, 2015). In west and central Africa, proper crop residue management assisted in minimizing anthracnose disease (Marley et al, 2005).…”
Section: Management Of Anthracnose Disease In Sorghummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various control options are internationally recommended to minimize yield losses. These include use of fungicides, cultural practices, disease free seeds, crop rotation and host resistance (Chala, Alemu, et al, 2010;Erpelding & Prom, 2004;Mathur et al, 2002;Silva et al, 2015). Crop protection chemicals are expensive and crop residue management in crops such as sorghum is difficult to apply.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%