1973
DOI: 10.2527/jas1973.364617x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotype-Environment Interaction in Sheep. III. Lamb Carcass Traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
1
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Commercial joints averaged 0.85 kg (neck), 1.08 kg (shoulder and foreshank), 1.46 kg (leg), and 3 kg (trunk), although some variability was shown among the breed types (Table 4). Comparing our results with previous estimates of heavier lambs from other countries like the USA (20.6-30.6 kg carcass weight; Carter et al 1973;Leeds et al 2008) and Australia (19-24 kg carcass weight; Hopkins and Fogarty 1998), the carcass yield (53% versus 49%) was very similar despite differences in carcass weight. Focusing on the commercial joints, Hopkins and Fogarty (1998) and Leeds et al (2008) reported lighter necks, whereas Carter et al (1973) and Leeds et al (2008) reported heavier legs in light lambs, although these differences could be partially attributed to differing carcass retail procedures and the corresponding commercial joints.…”
Section: Carcass Quarteringsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Commercial joints averaged 0.85 kg (neck), 1.08 kg (shoulder and foreshank), 1.46 kg (leg), and 3 kg (trunk), although some variability was shown among the breed types (Table 4). Comparing our results with previous estimates of heavier lambs from other countries like the USA (20.6-30.6 kg carcass weight; Carter et al 1973;Leeds et al 2008) and Australia (19-24 kg carcass weight; Hopkins and Fogarty 1998), the carcass yield (53% versus 49%) was very similar despite differences in carcass weight. Focusing on the commercial joints, Hopkins and Fogarty (1998) and Leeds et al (2008) reported lighter necks, whereas Carter et al (1973) and Leeds et al (2008) reported heavier legs in light lambs, although these differences could be partially attributed to differing carcass retail procedures and the corresponding commercial joints.…”
Section: Carcass Quarteringsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Pode-se observar pela análise da variância, que não houve diferença significativa (P≥0,05) entre tratamentos para as variáveis estudadas. Ao tomar como base os valores médios obtidos para rendimento de carcaça, os dados deste experimento se colocaram acima dos valores obtidos por CARVALHO et al (1980), SIQUEIRA (1983, porém são concordantes com KEMP et al (1970), CARTER et al (1973, BONIFACINO et al (1979( b) e LIRETTE et al (1984 Ciência Rural, v. 29, n. 3, 1999. SOUZA (1993, revisando sobre o assunto, observou que as fêmeas apresentam um melhor rendimento que os machos, o que se explica pela maior precocidade delas.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…O sexo também influencia nas proporções das partes da carcaça. CARTER et al (1973), trabalhando com cordeiros abatidos com pesos entre 40 e 50kg, verificaram que pesos de quarto e paleta são maiores para machos inteiros, enquanto que fêmeas apresentam maior peso de lombo. MAHENDRAKAR et al (1988) verificaram que cordeiros machos inteiros da raça Bannur, abatidos com 11 meses de idade, apresentaram carcaça com a seguinte proporção de quarto, paleta, lombo e pescoço: 35,5; 27,6; 9,6 e 6,7; respectivamente.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified