2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aasci.2018.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotype by environment interactions of twenty accessions of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] across two locations in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, all the genotypes demonstrated little variation in yield and other traits across the two locations with the exception of TGX1448-2E which differed significantly in pod weight and seed yield (Table 3). This consistency or little variation in yield of most of the genotypes across the environments showed general adaptation as observed by Adeseye et al (2018). Similar findings were obtained by Yan and Tinker (2006); Jose et al (2017) who reported small variation between two locations in respect to days to flowering in cowpea.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In this study, all the genotypes demonstrated little variation in yield and other traits across the two locations with the exception of TGX1448-2E which differed significantly in pod weight and seed yield (Table 3). This consistency or little variation in yield of most of the genotypes across the environments showed general adaptation as observed by Adeseye et al (2018). Similar findings were obtained by Yan and Tinker (2006); Jose et al (2017) who reported small variation between two locations in respect to days to flowering in cowpea.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…With particular interest to note is TGX1485-1D that recorded the same value for 100 seed weight (14.00 g) across the two locations. This consistent or little variation in performance of a genotype across the environments showed general adaptation as observed by Adeseye et al (2018). It was also observed that there were variations between the two locations with respect to days to flowering especially in Kafanchan, Langtang, TGX1448-2E and TGX1835-10E.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The mean value of plant height for all locations in all rounds of forage harvesting stage is presented in (Fahad et al, 2017) were mainly due to the wider response of genotypes to the environment. The consistency of genotypes across environments enables breeders to make effective evaluation of genotypes with minimum cost in a few environments (Adebola et al, 2018). In this regard, the present study showed consistency in plant height for genotype FGI-8091 followed by FGI-3054 and FGI-0916.…”
Section: Plant Height and Forage Yield At Harvestsupporting
confidence: 51%