2006
DOI: 10.1590/s1415-47572006000100028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genotoxicity and mutagenicity of water contaminated with tannery effluents, as evaluated by the micronucleus test and comet assay using the fish Oreochromis niloticus and chromosome aberrations in onion root-tips

Abstract: Cytotoxicity of metals is important because some metals are potential mutagens able to induce tumors in humans and experimental animals. Chromium can damage DNA in several ways, including DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) which generate chromosomal aberrations, micronucleus formation, sister chromatid exchange, formation of DNA adducts and alterations in DNA replication and transcription. In our study, water samples from three sites in the Córrego dos Bagres stream in the Franca municipality of the Brazilian sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
123
0
34

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 297 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(39 reference statements)
6
123
0
34
Order By: Relevance
“…Scalon et al (2010) have assessed the genotoxicity of the water collected from three points in the Sinos River during four seasons, using the comet assay in the fish Hyphessobrycon luetkenii, having found that the frequency of cells with DNA damage was higher during spring at the sites located in the upper and middle sections. Differences between sampling sites or periods in a river could be related to differences in the sources of contamination (types of pollutants), the volume of water (alteration in the concentration of genotoxic agents) and/or the cumulative effect of different sources (Matsumoto et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scalon et al (2010) have assessed the genotoxicity of the water collected from three points in the Sinos River during four seasons, using the comet assay in the fish Hyphessobrycon luetkenii, having found that the frequency of cells with DNA damage was higher during spring at the sites located in the upper and middle sections. Differences between sampling sites or periods in a river could be related to differences in the sources of contamination (types of pollutants), the volume of water (alteration in the concentration of genotoxic agents) and/or the cumulative effect of different sources (Matsumoto et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could suggest that a synergistic effect of the elements found in vinasse could cause the observed changes. Also, according to Lerda [20] and Matsumoto et al [21], this can also be due to the exposure of cells to cadmium, copper, lead, chrome, and nickel, which increase the clastogenic and aneugenic effect on certain plants. The chemical analysis of vinasse samples did not reveal large quantities of these elements.…”
Section: Yamamoto and Kikuchimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,[32][33][34][35] Fish have received special attention because they are efficient bioindicators of environmental quality and are capable of metabolizing xenobiotics and pollutants accumulated in the aquatic environment. [36][37][38][39] Additionally, they play different roles in the food chain and bioaccumulate contaminants dissolved in water. 40,41 However, few fish species manage to survive in both polluted urban streams and the different types of Amazonian waters, which are classified as white, clear, and black waters, each with different physical and chemical characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%