2018
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomics of body fat percentage may contribute to sex bias in anorexia nervosa

Abstract: Anorexia nervosa (AN) occurs nine times more often in females than in males. Although environmental factors likely play a role, the reasons for this imbalanced sex ratio remain unresolved. AN displays high genetic correlations with anthropometric and metabolic traits. Given sex differences in body composition, we investigated the possible metabolic underpinnings of female propensity for AN. We conducted sex‐specific GWAS in a healthy and medication‐free subsample of the UK Biobank (n = 155,961), identifying 77… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
104
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
10
104
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cross-trait analyses for PRSADHD identified an association with tobacco use disorder, which is known to be highly prevalent in individuals with ADHD (32), suggesting that we are capturing some of the genetic risk for the disorder. Likewise, cross-trait analyses for PRSAN showed a negative association with obesity, which aligns with a recent study where the authors suggest the increased liability to AN in females may be due to sex-specific anthropometric and metabolic genetic factors, specifically body fat percentage (33). In our study it is unclear as whether individuals with high PRSAN have a lower propensity for obesity in the absence of an eating disorder, or whether the result is confounded by the presence of an undiagnosed eating disorder.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Cross-trait analyses for PRSADHD identified an association with tobacco use disorder, which is known to be highly prevalent in individuals with ADHD (32), suggesting that we are capturing some of the genetic risk for the disorder. Likewise, cross-trait analyses for PRSAN showed a negative association with obesity, which aligns with a recent study where the authors suggest the increased liability to AN in females may be due to sex-specific anthropometric and metabolic genetic factors, specifically body fat percentage (33). In our study it is unclear as whether individuals with high PRSAN have a lower propensity for obesity in the absence of an eating disorder, or whether the result is confounded by the presence of an undiagnosed eating disorder.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The relationship between AN and insulin sensitivity should be investigated by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp that showed mixed findings in very small samples (Castillo, Scheen, Jandrain, & Lefèbvre, ; Castillo, Scheen, Lefebvre, & Luyckx, ; Dostálová et al, ; Karczewska‐Kupczewska et al, ; Pannacciulli et al, ; Prioletta et al, ; Zuniga‐Guajardo, Garfinkel, & Zinman, ). This approach is supported by epidemiological associations of AN with type 1 diabetes (Hedman et al, ) and its genetic overlap with fasting insulin (Duncan et al, ), type 2 diabetes (Watson et al, ), and insulin sensitivity (Hübel et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the above identified loci, 17 were reported by GWAS or meta-analysis of DXA-derived lean mass [13, 15, 19]; 104 were reported by a study of electronic impedance measured lean mass in a subset UKB cohort subjects (N=155,961) [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%