2002
DOI: 10.2225/vol5-issue1-fulltext-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic variability in Vitis vinifera L. Sangiovese assessed by microsatellite and non-radioactive AFLP test

Abstract: The use of microorganisms for biological purposes has become an effective alternative to control plant pathogens. There are many examples of formulations using bacterial or fungal strains with biocontrol applications. Among them, members of the genus Bacillus are well known antibiotic producers. However, the increased capacity of antibiotic production obtained by direct mutagenesis of wild strains, has seldom been reported in the open literature. This research refers to the mutation of the A47 Bacillus strain,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(21 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has resulted in a great genetic variability in germplasm that has often allowed misidentification and cases of homonymy and synonymy (Vignani et al, 2002). Historical evidence and information, combined with morphological data (ampelography), have frequently been used to characterise cultivars and to define relationships between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This has resulted in a great genetic variability in germplasm that has often allowed misidentification and cases of homonymy and synonymy (Vignani et al, 2002). Historical evidence and information, combined with morphological data (ampelography), have frequently been used to characterise cultivars and to define relationships between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In grapevine, SSRs (Simple Sequence Repeats) have been employed efficiently for cultivar identification (Bowers et al, 1999;Crespan, 2003;This et al, 2004;Jahnke et al, 2009;Zoghlami et al, 2009) and for clonal discrimination (Regner et al, 2000;Riaz et al, 2002;Bertsch et al, 2003;Crespan, 2003;Gonzàles-Techera et al, 2004;Hocquigny et al, 2004). On the contrary, some other researches have revealed the inability of SSRs to distinguish among grapevine clones Imazio et al, 2002;Vignani et al, 2002;Ibànez et al, 2003). Imazio et al (2002) recommended AFLP (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism) over the SSR approach when the goal is the definition of identity/diversity among different clones of the same variety, or among genetically closely related cultivars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Greece more than 300 grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) are grown and classic ampelographic (Krimbas, 1943;Davidis, 1967;Vlachos, 1986;Stavrakakis, 2010), biochemical (Stavrakakis & Loukas, 1983) and molecular methods (Stavrakakis at al., 1997;Stavrakakis & Biniari, 1998;Stavrakaki, 2008) have been used for their discrimination and classification. Among the various polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based DNA marker techniques available, the Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) is often used, because it is ideal when the goal is the definition of identity among different clones of the same variety or among genetically close related cultivars, with positive results in differentiating grapevine cultivars and clones (Vignani et al, 2002;As far as its origin is concerned, the ampelographic characters classify Korinthiaki staphis as well as Korinthiaki lefki to proles pontica, to which most Greek grapevine varieties belong and to sub-proles balcanica (Negrul, 1938(Negrul, , 1946Levadoux, 1956). This point of view is verified by the results of a study using molecular markers (Aradhya et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be used to explore the presence of heterozygosity and/or identity (Morgante and Olivieri, 1993). Because of that, microsatellites are one of the most powerful molecular markers to understand detailed patterns of parentage composition and for individual discrimination in clone identification (e.g., Dayanandan et al, 1998;Vignani et al, 2002;Bekkaoui et al, 2003;James et al, 2003;Wyman et al, 2003). Additionally, microsatellite primers may be transferred between closely related species because of the homology of flanking regions of simple sequence repeats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%