Abstract:PURPOSE Pulmonary involvement is rare in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) that recurs after treatment for localized disease. Guidelines recommend intensive systemic therapy, similar to patients with liver metastases, but some lung-recurrent mHSPC may have good outcomes. Genomic features of lung metastases may clarify disease aggression, but are poorly understood since lung biopsy is rarely performed. We present a comparative assessment of genomic drivers and heterogeneity in metachronous pr… Show more
“…14,15,16 Additionally, studies have shown that underlying biology could be more important analysis is muddled by the aggregation of "visceral" disease even though the biology and prognosis of these sites may differ depending on sites of metastasis. 19…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Missing information on some variables such as tumor stage or M‐Stage at presentation should be noted. Further, our analysis is muddled by the aggregation of “visceral” disease even though the biology and prognosis of these sites may differ depending on sites of metastasis 19 …”
Background
We performed a secondary analysis of ACIS study to determine if synchronous versus metachronous metastatic presentation has any association with survival and treatment response to dual androgen receptor axis‐targeted therapy (ARAT) in docetaxel naïve metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Methodology
In this phase III randomized controlled trial, docetaxel naïve mCRPC patients were randomized to either apalutamide or placebo combined with abiraterone and prednisone. Multivariable Cox regression models were applied to determine the adjusted association of M‐stage with radiographic progression‐free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS). To determine the heterogeneity of treatment effect based on metastatic stage (M‐stage) at presentation, Cox regression was applied with interaction terms between M‐stage and treatment.
Results
Among 972 patients, 432 had M0, 334 had M1, while M‐stage at presentation was unknown in 206. There was no association of M‐stage at presentation with rPFS in patients with prior local therapy (LT) (hazard ratio for M1‐stage: 1.22 [95% confidence interval: 0.82–1.82]; unknown: 1.03 [0.77–1.38]) or without prior LT (M1‐stage: 0.87 [0.64–1.19]; unknown: 1.15 [0.77–1.72]) with no significant heterogeneity. Similarly, there was no association of M‐stage with OS in patients with prior LT (M1‐stage: 1.04 [0.81–1.33]; unknown: 0.98 [0.79–1.21]) or without prior LT (M1‐stage: 0.95 [0.70–1.29]; unknown: 1.17 [0.80–1.71]) with no significant heterogeneity. Based on M‐stage at presentation, we did not find any significant heterogeneity in treatment effect on rPFS (interaction p = 0.13), and OS (interaction p = 0.87).
Conclusion
M‐stage at presentation had no association with survival in chemotherapy‐naïve mCRPC. We did not find any statistically significant heterogeneity in efficacy of dual ARAT based on synchronous versus metachronous presentation.
“…14,15,16 Additionally, studies have shown that underlying biology could be more important analysis is muddled by the aggregation of "visceral" disease even though the biology and prognosis of these sites may differ depending on sites of metastasis. 19…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Missing information on some variables such as tumor stage or M‐Stage at presentation should be noted. Further, our analysis is muddled by the aggregation of “visceral” disease even though the biology and prognosis of these sites may differ depending on sites of metastasis 19 …”
Background
We performed a secondary analysis of ACIS study to determine if synchronous versus metachronous metastatic presentation has any association with survival and treatment response to dual androgen receptor axis‐targeted therapy (ARAT) in docetaxel naïve metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Methodology
In this phase III randomized controlled trial, docetaxel naïve mCRPC patients were randomized to either apalutamide or placebo combined with abiraterone and prednisone. Multivariable Cox regression models were applied to determine the adjusted association of M‐stage with radiographic progression‐free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS). To determine the heterogeneity of treatment effect based on metastatic stage (M‐stage) at presentation, Cox regression was applied with interaction terms between M‐stage and treatment.
Results
Among 972 patients, 432 had M0, 334 had M1, while M‐stage at presentation was unknown in 206. There was no association of M‐stage at presentation with rPFS in patients with prior local therapy (LT) (hazard ratio for M1‐stage: 1.22 [95% confidence interval: 0.82–1.82]; unknown: 1.03 [0.77–1.38]) or without prior LT (M1‐stage: 0.87 [0.64–1.19]; unknown: 1.15 [0.77–1.72]) with no significant heterogeneity. Similarly, there was no association of M‐stage with OS in patients with prior LT (M1‐stage: 1.04 [0.81–1.33]; unknown: 0.98 [0.79–1.21]) or without prior LT (M1‐stage: 0.95 [0.70–1.29]; unknown: 1.17 [0.80–1.71]) with no significant heterogeneity. Based on M‐stage at presentation, we did not find any significant heterogeneity in treatment effect on rPFS (interaction p = 0.13), and OS (interaction p = 0.87).
Conclusion
M‐stage at presentation had no association with survival in chemotherapy‐naïve mCRPC. We did not find any statistically significant heterogeneity in efficacy of dual ARAT based on synchronous versus metachronous presentation.
“…Fonseca et al. reported the results of an analysis of 10 cases of metastatic castration‐sensitive prostate cancer that recurred after radical treatment, in which biopsy or resection of the lung metastases was performed 10 . They found that recurrent lung metastases did not contain the deleterious mutations in TP53 and DNA damage‐repair genes that characterize aggressive cancer, and that copy number changes and clonal mutations were highly conserved between metastases and primary lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fonseca et al reported the results of an analysis of 10 cases of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer that recurred after radical treatment, in which biopsy or resection of the lung metastases was performed. 10 They found that recurrent lung metastases did not contain the deleterious mutations in TP53 and DNA damage-repair genes that characterize aggressive cancer, and that copy number changes and clonal mutations were highly conserved between metastases and primary lesions. This report suggests that selected metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer with recurrence in the lung may have different biological features than metastatic cancers with aggressive features, although these patients were carefully selected based on their clinical course and underwent biopsy or resection for lung metastases.…”
Abbreviations & Acronyms CRPC = castration-resistant prostate cancer DTX = docetaxel Enz = enzalutamide EORTC = European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer ESTRO = European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology GG = Grade Group IMRT = intensity-modulated radiation therapy LH-RH = luteinizing hormonereleasing hormone OP-CPRC = oligoprogressive castration-resistant prostate cancer PSA = prostate-specific antigen PSDT = progressive site-directed therapy RP = radical prostatectomy VATS = video-assisted thoracic surgery WB-DWI = whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging
“…Historically, the genomic features of lung metastasis were poorly explored in the literature apart from two case series that investigated the genomics of lung metastasis on metastatic hormone sensitive PCa (mHSPC) patients [56,60]. Shenderoev et al identified 16 mHSPC patients with plenty of variations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, homologous recombination deficit (HRD) genes, PI3K pathway genes, Wnt signaling pathway genes, and TP53 mutations [56].…”
Prostate cancer lung metastasis represents a clinical conundrum due to their implication of advanced disease progression and the complexities they introduce in treatment planning. As the disease progresses to distant sites such as the lung, the clinical management becomes increasingly intricate, requiring tailored therapeutic strategies to address the unique characteristics of metastatic lesions. This review seeks to synthesize the current state of knowledge surrounding prostate cancer metastasis to the lung, shedding light on the diverse array of clinical presentations encountered, ranging from subtle radiological findings to overt symptomatic manifestations. By examining the diagnostic modalities utilized in identifying this metastasis, including advanced imaging techniques and histopathological analyses, the review aims to provide insights into the diagnostic landscape and the challenges associated with accurately characterizing lung metastatic lesions in prostate cancer patients. Moreover, the review delves into the nuances of therapeutic interventions employed in managing prostate cancer lung metastasis, encompassing systemic treatments such as hormonal therapies and chemotherapy, as well as metastasis-directed therapies including surgery and radiotherapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.