2016
DOI: 10.1111/mec.13594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic characterization of sex‐identification markers inSebastes carnatusandSebastes chrysomelasrockfishes

Abstract: Fish have evolved a variety of sex-determining (SD) systems including male heterogamy (XY), female heterogamy (ZW) and environmental SD. Little is known about SD mechanisms of Sebastes rockfishes, a highly speciose genus of importance to evolutionary and conservation biology. Here, we characterize the sex determination system in the sympatrically distributed sister species Sebastes chrysomelas and Sebastes carnatus. To identify sex-specific genotypic markers, double digest restriction site - associated DNA seq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
111
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(66 reference statements)
1
111
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The 435 male-specific loci detected here suggested at least 218 male-specific PstI sites, which is far higher than the number of sex-specific loci in other similar studies based on RAD-Seq [17,33,36]. However, considering the specificity of each study (genome size, frequency of the restriction site and parameters used for the loci assembly), we could not directly compare the number of sex-linked markers or the number of male-specific markers.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…The 435 male-specific loci detected here suggested at least 218 male-specific PstI sites, which is far higher than the number of sex-specific loci in other similar studies based on RAD-Seq [17,33,36]. However, considering the specificity of each study (genome size, frequency of the restriction site and parameters used for the loci assembly), we could not directly compare the number of sex-linked markers or the number of male-specific markers.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Sequencing paired-end reads, as we have done here, will generate larger RAD contigs, which in turn increases the probability of identifying genes Baxter et al, 2011;. Sex-specific RAD markers with gene fragments can be used to query genomic assemblies of related species to identify the sex chromosomes [Bruneaux et al, 2013;Fowler and Buonaccorsi, 2016;Qiu et al, 2016]. This is the approach we successfully applied here to identify synteny between the avian Z and the P. wirshingi ZZ/ZW.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A solution might be to increase sample size; however, the number of shared loci decreases with sample numbers in RAD‐seq data (Mastretta‐Yanes et al, ). Several studies have had success by sampling ~5–20 individuals per sex (Fowler & Buonaccorsi, ; Gamble et al, ; Gamble & Zarkower, ; Jeffries et al, ); however, false positives can also be problematic with very small numbers of males and females, and greater skew in sample sexes. Implementing and developing approaches to quantify the false positive rate of identifying sex‐linked sequences is a future priority when using this approach (see Box 1).…”
Section: Guide For Identifying Sex Chromosomesmentioning
confidence: 99%