2020
DOI: 10.1080/03014460.2019.1705390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genomic blueprint of population of Rajasthan based on autosomal STR markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference samples of the case were directly subjected to amplification as done in our previous studies [7]. Quantity analysis of the isolated DNA was performed with the help of QuantifilerTM Trio quantification kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CA, USA-Thermo) on Quant Studio 5 system (Thermo).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference samples of the case were directly subjected to amplification as done in our previous studies [7]. Quantity analysis of the isolated DNA was performed with the help of QuantifilerTM Trio quantification kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CA, USA-Thermo) on Quant Studio 5 system (Thermo).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A neighbour joining (NJ) tree (Fig. 2 a) based on the Nei's genetic distance, constructed using POPTREE-2 software, was used to investigate the genetic affinity between the studied (admixed and Teli ) populations and the reported Indian populations namely, the Konkanastha Brahmins (Maharashtra) [ 22 ]; the Mahadev Kolis (Maharashtra) [ 22 ]; the Iyengars (Tamil Nadu) [ 22 ]; the Kurumans (Tamil Nadu) [ 22 ]; the Yerukulas (Andhra Pradesh) [ 23 ]; the Koras (West Bengal) [ 24 ]; the Baniyas (Punjab) [ 25 ]; the population of Jharkhand [ 26 ]; the population of Uttar Pradesh [ 27 ]; the population of Rajasthan [ 28 ]; the populations of Central India [ 29 ]; and the pooled populations belonging to the geographical boundaries of India [ 30 ]. The NJ tree revealed that the studied admixed and Teli populations of Maharashtra pooled into one cluster with the Konkanastha Brahmin s of Maharashtra and the Kurumans of Tamil Nadu.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic dataset of present study was compared with the dataset of reported indigenous populations viz., Balmiki (Punjab) 29 , Sakaldwipi Brahmin (Jharkhand) 29 , Konkanastha_Brahmin (Maharashtra) 29 , Iyengar (Tamilnadu) 29 , Kurumans (Tamilnadu) 29 , Munda (Jharkhand) 29 , Chenchu (Andhra Pradesh) 30 , Lambadi (Andhra Pradesh) 30 , Naikpod_Gond (Andhra Pradesh) 30 , Yerukula (Andhra Pradesh) 30 , Munda (Chotanagpur) 31 , Santal (Chotanagpur) 31 , Oraon (Chotanagpur) 31 , Lodha (Bengal) 32 , Kora (Bengal) 32 , Maheli (Bengal) 32 , Central Indian Population 33 , Gond (MP) 34 , Gond_2 (MP) 35 , Gond_1 (MP) 29 , Oraon (Chhattishgarh) 36 , Population of Jharkhand 37 , Jat Sikh (Punjab) 38 , Baniya (Punjab) 38 , Khatri (Punjab) 38 , Population of Uttar Pradesh 39 , Kahar population (UP) 40 , Himachal Pradesh Population 18 , Gorkhas 41 , Tamil Population (Tamil Nadu) 42 , Population of Rajasthan 43 , Population of Odisha 44 and Bhuiyan Population (Jharkhand) 45 ;and global populations namely; Manchu Population of China 46 , Han Population of Southern China 47 , Tibetan Population (Nepal) 48 , Kathmandu 49 , Tibet 49 , Newar 49 1).…”
Section: Genetic Data Of Reported Populations For Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%