2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-009-0201-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome size variation and morphological differentiation within Ranunculus parnassifolius group (Ranunculaceae) from calcareous screes in the Northwest of Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
59
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
59
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, our results differ from those of Popp et al (2008) and Dušková et al (2010), who successfully calculated relative DNA content from dried tissues, although this divergence probably lies in different fluorochromes used [4',6-diamidino- 2-phenylindole (DAPI) versus propidium iodide]. Temsch and Greilhuber (2010) considered that the C-values obtained for dried material of Knautia ambigua should be regarded as preliminary, since HPCVs were above the acceptable 5% (Suda and Trávníček 2006;Greilhuber et al 2007), and Cires et al (2009) noted that measurements in dry leaves resulted in lower yields of intact nuclei and coefficient of variation (HPCV) slightly higher than in fresh tissues. Despite obtaining significantly different C-value estimations for fresh and desiccated material, Bainard et al (2011) regarded tissue treatment as one of the many factors that potentially interfere in flow cytometry genome size estimation, accounting for a variation (up to 9.7%) they considered as an acceptable error margin.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this respect, our results differ from those of Popp et al (2008) and Dušková et al (2010), who successfully calculated relative DNA content from dried tissues, although this divergence probably lies in different fluorochromes used [4',6-diamidino- 2-phenylindole (DAPI) versus propidium iodide]. Temsch and Greilhuber (2010) considered that the C-values obtained for dried material of Knautia ambigua should be regarded as preliminary, since HPCVs were above the acceptable 5% (Suda and Trávníček 2006;Greilhuber et al 2007), and Cires et al (2009) noted that measurements in dry leaves resulted in lower yields of intact nuclei and coefficient of variation (HPCV) slightly higher than in fresh tissues. Despite obtaining significantly different C-value estimations for fresh and desiccated material, Bainard et al (2011) regarded tissue treatment as one of the many factors that potentially interfere in flow cytometry genome size estimation, accounting for a variation (up to 9.7%) they considered as an acceptable error margin.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Despite obtaining significantly different C-value estimations for fresh and desiccated material, Bainard et al (2011) regarded tissue treatment as one of the many factors that potentially interfere in flow cytometry genome size estimation, accounting for a variation (up to 9.7%) they considered as an acceptable error margin. Although the effectiveness of flow cytometric analysis for genome size determination rapidly decreases with storage time, it should still remain suitable for-at least-ploidy level determination (Suda and Trávníček 2006;Cires et al 2009). It is noteworthy that, in our study, HPCV from silica gel measurements, although below 5%, do not necessary have a corresponding accurate DNA content, suggesting that HPCV might not be a good quality indicator for this type of material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has included geographic surveys (e.g., Šmarda and Stančík 2006;Whittemore and Olsen 2011), phylogeographic studies (Eidesen et al 2007;Schönswetter et al 2007;Suda et al 2007;Popp et al 2008), and studies of the evolution of polyploid complexes (Harbaugh 2008;Balao et al 2009;Hersch-Green and Cronn 2009;Dušková et al 2010;Sonnleitner et al 2010). At the same time, the practical advantages of the method have led researchers to extend its use beyond ploidy analysis into reports of absolute genome size (e.g., Little et al 2007;Cires et al 2009;Whittemore and Olsen 2011) and fine-scale comparisons among populations or species of the same ploidy Popp et al 2008;Hersch-Green and Cronn 2009;Balao et al 2009;Dušková et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Morphology has always been the first taxonomic evidence for the recognition and delimitation of infraspecific categories. The key role of morphology in defining infraspecific taxa is shown by the fact that no formal taxonomic status would be assigned when there is no morphological differences among populations of particular plant species (Cires et al, 2009;Lohwasser et al, 2010).…”
Section: Ajabsmentioning
confidence: 99%