2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12983-018-0262-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome sequencing of Rhinorhipus Lawrence exposes an early branch of the Coleoptera

Abstract: BackgroundRhinorhipidae Lawrence, 1988 is an enigmatic beetle family represented by a single species, Rhinorhipus tamborinensis Lawrence, 1988, from Australia, with poorly established affinities near the superfamily Elateroidea (click beetles, soldier beetles and fireflies) or the more inclusive series (infraorder) Elateriformia. Its evolutionary position may inform the basal relationships of the suborder Polyphaga, the largest clade of Coleoptera.ResultsWe analyzed four densely sampled DNA datasets of major c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
62
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(108 reference statements)
6
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both trees show that Buprestoidea (Buprestidae only, without Schizopodidae) and Byrrhoidea (excluding Psephenidae) are reciprocally monophyletic groups; Elateroidea clusters as a sister to a clade of Byrrhoidea and Buprestoidea, but Psephenidae (of Byrrhoidea) is located within the Scirtoidea group. Our phylogenetic results support that Buprestoidea is a monophylum that is close to Byrrhoidea [12,14,16,19,21,22,30]; Buprestoidea and Byrrhoidea cluster within a clade sister to Elateroidea [16,28,29,31], and the position of Psephenidae is undetermined [30].…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysessupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Both trees show that Buprestoidea (Buprestidae only, without Schizopodidae) and Byrrhoidea (excluding Psephenidae) are reciprocally monophyletic groups; Elateroidea clusters as a sister to a clade of Byrrhoidea and Buprestoidea, but Psephenidae (of Byrrhoidea) is located within the Scirtoidea group. Our phylogenetic results support that Buprestoidea is a monophylum that is close to Byrrhoidea [12,14,16,19,21,22,30]; Buprestoidea and Byrrhoidea cluster within a clade sister to Elateroidea [16,28,29,31], and the position of Psephenidae is undetermined [30].…”
Section: Phylogenetic Analysessupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The predicted species‐specific gene models were then used for ab initio gene predictions in augustus , and predicted protein coding sequences were used in Orthograph v. 0.6.1 (Petersen et al , ). Outgroup data were assembled as described in previous studies (Kusy et al , ,b). The completeness of transcriptomes, genomes and predicted protein‐coding gene sets were evaluated with busco using Endopterygota single‐copy orthologs as targets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, molecular phylogenies suggest that neoteny has multiple origins and neotenics occur in limited ranges (Bocak et al , ; Masek et al , ). Therefore, we aimed to test whether neotenic taxa evolved repeatedly in Lycidae, in congruence with evolutionary trends for soft‐bodiedness and neoteny in Elateroidea (Kundrata & Bocak, ; Kundrata et al , ; Bocak et al , ; Kusy et al , ,b). We used genomic data, as these can provide independent and decisive phylogenetic information to analyse the distribution of homoplasy in the morphological phylogeny (Misof et al , ; Peters et al , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our Bayesian analysis (using the discrete Marcov k model) of the same dataset strongly supported the monophyly of the two families (C. Cai, unpublished data). The molecular-based phylogenetic studies are promising for elucidating the interrelationships in Archostemata, but published results appear limited by insufficient taxon and gene sampling, and the effects of missing data (Bocak et al, 2014;McKenna et al, 2015;Kusy et al, 2018;Linard et al, 2018). One of the challenges we face is that Crowsoniella relicta Pace (Crowsoniellidae) has not been sequenced because so far only three specimens are known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%