2016
DOI: 10.21508/1027-4065-2016-61-6-13-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetics of Mental Retardation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the overall efficiency of NGS efficiency is higher than that of CMA. We believe that NGS should be the standard first-line diagnostic method after the standard examination (karyotype, TMS, urinary organic acids, abnormal methylation of the FMR1 promoter region, point mutations, and deletions/duplications in the MECP2 gene [ 50 ]) in patients with IDD in Russia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the overall efficiency of NGS efficiency is higher than that of CMA. We believe that NGS should be the standard first-line diagnostic method after the standard examination (karyotype, TMS, urinary organic acids, abnormal methylation of the FMR1 promoter region, point mutations, and deletions/duplications in the MECP2 gene [ 50 ]) in patients with IDD in Russia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%