2013
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2013.412300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Variability of <i>Brachiaria ruziziensis</i> Clones to <i>Collaria oleosa</i> (Hemiptera: Miridae) Based on Leaf Injuries

Abstract: Collaria oleosa causes leaf injuries to the main forage grasses used for cattle feeding in Brazil. The aim of this work was to determine resistance of B. ruziziensis clones against C. oleosa. Eighty B. ruziziensis clones were maintained in greenhouse, in which C. oleosa natural infestations have been occurring in previous years. After 40 days, damage score and chlorophyll content reduction were assessed for all clones. By using these parameters, genetic gain was estimated based on REML/BLUP mixed models. We ob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some agronomic traits in U. ruziziensis and other forages are often visually assessed under field conditions because this assessment is practical and effective. Traits routinely evaluated using such techniques include i) pest and disease resistance (Silva et al 2013), ii) regrowth capacity (Berchembrock et al 2020, iii) stay-green (Wilkinson and Hill 2003), and iv) plant growth and biomass production (Burton 1982, Price andCasler 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some agronomic traits in U. ruziziensis and other forages are often visually assessed under field conditions because this assessment is practical and effective. Traits routinely evaluated using such techniques include i) pest and disease resistance (Silva et al 2013), ii) regrowth capacity (Berchembrock et al 2020, iii) stay-green (Wilkinson and Hill 2003), and iv) plant growth and biomass production (Burton 1982, Price andCasler 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%