1981
DOI: 10.2307/2408125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Variability in Reproduction Rates in Marine Phytoplankton Populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that natural populations of dinoflagellates show a high intraspecific variability in terms of growth rate (Brand, 1981;Costas, 1990), and the growth rate variability of different isolates of Protoceratium reticulatum from Greenland grown under exactly the same environmental conditions agrees with this conclusion. In any case, growth rate is an important measure to quantify the effect of any environmental factor.…”
Section: Growth Ratesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…It is known that natural populations of dinoflagellates show a high intraspecific variability in terms of growth rate (Brand, 1981;Costas, 1990), and the growth rate variability of different isolates of Protoceratium reticulatum from Greenland grown under exactly the same environmental conditions agrees with this conclusion. In any case, growth rate is an important measure to quantify the effect of any environmental factor.…”
Section: Growth Ratesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Together with the Gephyrocapsa-Emiliania plexus, Calcidiscus is probably the best documented coccolithophorid genus (Brand 1981;Knappertsbusch et al 1997, Knappertsbusch 2000Baumann and Sprengel 2000;Renaud and Klaas 2001;Renaud et al 2002;Quinn et al, 2003). Like the aforementioned genera it has a broad, inter-oceanic occurrence spanning a range of ecological variation and a very good, continuous fossil record through the last 23 Ma.…”
Section: Calcidiscus Spp (Plate 4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By measuring the reproduction rates of a large number of E. huxleyi and G. oceanica clones under the same environmental conditions, Brand (1981Brand ( , 1982 demonstrated both the stability of this parameter in single clones, and considerable variation between clones. He therefore concluded that a natural population is not clonal but consists of a mixture of genotypes with different reproductive potentials (Brand 1982).…”
Section: Ecological and Biogeographical Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to allow full environmental acclimation, the strains were grown under these constant experimental conditions during two months. The maintenance of the strains under the same stable environmental conditions is necessary for disengaging environmental and genetic influences on the phenotypic variability, which ensures that differences found among strains are exclusively due to genetic variability (Brand, 1981;Costas, 1990).…”
Section: Isolation Of Strains and Culture Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%