2020
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2020.910.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study the phenotypic and genotypic coefficient of variation was found to be high for gluten content % and grain yield per plant. Similar observation was also reported by Kalimullah et al, [6] Ranjana et al, [7] Dutamo et al, [8] Arya et al, [9] Kumar et al, [2] and Prasad et al, [10]. Moderate GCV and PCV were observed in biological yield per plant, harvest index, number of productive tillers per plant.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In the present study the phenotypic and genotypic coefficient of variation was found to be high for gluten content % and grain yield per plant. Similar observation was also reported by Kalimullah et al, [6] Ranjana et al, [7] Dutamo et al, [8] Arya et al, [9] Kumar et al, [2] and Prasad et al, [10]. Moderate GCV and PCV were observed in biological yield per plant, harvest index, number of productive tillers per plant.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…High genotypic and phenotypic coefficient of variation was observed for number of spikes/plant (30.23 & 32.42) followed by number of effective tillers/plant (29.45 & 29.87) in EIII, High genotypic and phenotypic coefficient of variation was observed for number of effective tillers/plant (27.2 & 27.83) followed by number of spikes/plant (25.75 & 27.39) in pooled analysis. Similar results reported by Mundiyara et al [8], Tiwari et al [9], Rajput [10], Biru and Negash [3], Choudhary et al [4], Prasad et al[5] and Sharma et al[7] and Chaudhary et al[6]. This result indicated that there was negligible variation in all different environmental conditions means these traits were show genotypic variation they would be used in hybridization programme for better crop improvement.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Prasad et al[5], Chaudhary et al[6], Sharma et al[7].High genotypic and phenotypic coefficient of variation was observed for number of effective tillers/plant (26.67 & 26.84) followed by number of spikes/plant (25.2 & 25.37) in EI. However, moderate GCV & High heritability % was noted for most of the trait under study viz., number of effective tillers/plant (98.74) followed by number of spikes/plant (98.7), biological yield/plant (98.43), thousand grain weight (96.8), number of spikelets/spike (93.02), grain yield/plant (92.12), spike weight (89.24), harvest index (89.15), number of grains/spike (86.94) and spike length (77.17) in EI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High genetic gain was observed for grain yield per plant followed by biological yield per plant, number of productive tiller per plant, spike length and weight of grain per spike. Moderate genetic advance was recorded for number of spikelets per spike followed by number of grains per spike, plant height, chlorophyll content, harvest index and protein content and low for days to heading followed by days to maturity and 1000 grain weight" [32,33].…”
Section: (B) Genetic Advance:-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.The variability among parents was highest for days to maturity it ranged from 117 33. to 137.67 with the mean value 126.60.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%