2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.605.261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance in Carrot (Daucus carota var. sativa L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

7
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
7
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These traits were accountable to considerable influence by extraneous factors. This result is compliance with earlier researchers like Yadav et al, (2009), Jain et al, (2010), Amin and Singla (2010), Naseeruddin et al, (2011), Gupta et al, (2012), Sivathanu et al, (2014), Prajapati et al, (2014, Priya and Santhi (2015), Mallikarjunarao et al, (2015) and Teli et al, (2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These traits were accountable to considerable influence by extraneous factors. This result is compliance with earlier researchers like Yadav et al, (2009), Jain et al, (2010), Amin and Singla (2010), Naseeruddin et al, (2011), Gupta et al, (2012), Sivathanu et al, (2014), Prajapati et al, (2014, Priya and Santhi (2015), Mallikarjunarao et al, (2015) and Teli et al, (2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These characters were governed by non-additive gene action and selection based on these parameters found not effective. The findings were similar to other studies of Gupta et al, (2012), Kumar et al, (2012), Asima et al, (2013, Sivathanu et al, (2014), Mallikarjunarao et al, (2015, Datta et al, (2015) and Teli et al, (2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicated that, there was a less chance of improving of these traits by direct visual selection. These results were also noticed by Dod et al, (2013) [13] , Prajapati et al, (2014) [39] , Sivathanu et al, (2014) [48] , Mallikarjunarao et al, (2015) [31] , Priya and Santhi (2015) [40,42] , Nagar et al, (2016) [34] and Teli et al, (2017) [50] .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The highest root weight (127.2 g) was recorded in PC-161 with mean value 117.66 g while Flesh thickness had mean value 2.06 cm and varied 1.65 to 2.64 cm. Teli et al[33] and Singh et al[34] also observed large amount of variation in flesh thickness. Highest marketable yield was recorded in PC-161 (9.2 kg plot -1 ) with mean value 7.4 (kg plot…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%