2013
DOI: 10.9734/bbj/2013/2214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance in Pearl Millet (Penisetum glaucum [L.] R. Br.) Genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ese findings support previous studies on pearl millet at ICRISAT using a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population ICMB 841 × 863B which revealed that genotype × environment interactions were significant for grain yield, flowering time, plant height, and panicle length [40]. Similar reports show that genotype, environment, and their interaction effects influenced significant variation in pearl millet characteristics such as days to flowering, maturity, plant height, 1000-grain weight, grain yield, and seed micronutrients [41][42][43][44] and in finger millet [45,46] which corroborate the current findings.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…ese findings support previous studies on pearl millet at ICRISAT using a recombinant inbred line (RIL) population ICMB 841 × 863B which revealed that genotype × environment interactions were significant for grain yield, flowering time, plant height, and panicle length [40]. Similar reports show that genotype, environment, and their interaction effects influenced significant variation in pearl millet characteristics such as days to flowering, maturity, plant height, 1000-grain weight, grain yield, and seed micronutrients [41][42][43][44] and in finger millet [45,46] which corroborate the current findings.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The differences among GCV and PCV were narrow suggesting the presence of effects for environments appeared in the genotypes x year's interaction. These results are in agreement with many authors among them: Sumathi et al (2010), Yadav et al (2001), Lakshmana et al (2009), Govindaraj et al (2011), Subi and Idris (2013) and Salih et al (2014).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The improvement of these traits would be achieved through the phenotypic selection if the magnitude of additive effects were more important. Similar results were obtain of by: Johnson et al (1955), and Subi and Idris. (2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The ANOVA indicated significant variation among the genotypes tested and the GEI, showing that the multiplicative interaction of the genotypes and environments affected the performance of the test materials as also reported by Subi et al (2013). However, as noted by Crossa (1990), ANOVA does not explore the underlying structure within the GEI and thus other methods were adapted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%