2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-022-07295-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variability, combining ability and molecular diversity-based parental line selection for heterosis breeding in field corn (Zea mays L.)

Abstract: Background The demand of maize crop is increasing day by day, hence to reduce the production and demand gap, there is a need to extract the high yielding parental lines to improve per se yield of the hybrids, which could help to enhance the productivity in maize crops. Methods and results The present investigation was carried out to select the best medium maturing inbred lines, among a set of 118 inbred lines. Based on the Duncan multiple range test, out o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering disease pressure characters, CM‐500 (Group 5) is one of the best resistant lines recorded in this study to consider for cultivation despite its low yield (2.855 t/ha) compared to other resistant lines like 11074 (Group 2) as shown in Tables 3 and 4. As in the study of Liu et al (2003), Azad et al (2012), Kumar et al (2015), Sood et al (2017), Kandel et al (2018), Singh et al (2019), Zawadi et al (2021), and Mukri et al (2022), current study results are in confirmatory with their findings regrading mean values between inbred lines forming clusters.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering disease pressure characters, CM‐500 (Group 5) is one of the best resistant lines recorded in this study to consider for cultivation despite its low yield (2.855 t/ha) compared to other resistant lines like 11074 (Group 2) as shown in Tables 3 and 4. As in the study of Liu et al (2003), Azad et al (2012), Kumar et al (2015), Sood et al (2017), Kandel et al (2018), Singh et al (2019), Zawadi et al (2021), and Mukri et al (2022), current study results are in confirmatory with their findings regrading mean values between inbred lines forming clusters.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Sood et al (2017),Kandel et al (2018),Singh et al (2019),Zawadi et al (2021), andMukri et al (2022), current study results are in confirmatory with their findings regrading mean values between inbred lines forming clusters.3.7 | Designation of resistant and susceptible genotypes after disease quantificationTolerance and resistance are two mechanisms against parasitism in crops. All cultivated plants come from wild species (e.g.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Statistical analyses were made using SPSS software (version 19.0; IBM, Armonk, New York, NY, USA). Significance ( p < 0.05) was determined using a Duncan’s multiple range test [ 47 , 48 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic characterization of maize using molecular markers has been done in inbred lines and populations, lowland tropical, subtropical midaltitude highland inbred lines, tropical maize germplasm, and many others (Warburton et al, 2002;Xia et al, 2004;George et al, 2004;Xia et al, 2005;Qi-Lun et al, 2008;Mukri et al, 2022). However, aside from the study conducted by Bautista et al (2015), the genetic diversity of Philippine traditional maize populations has not been investigated thoroughly using molecular markers, which are more informative and indicative of unique allelic profiles (Warburton et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%