2018
DOI: 10.19045/bspab.2018.70068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variability analysis of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes for yield and related parameters

Abstract: The present experiment was conducted to find out the genetic variability in 100 different wheat genotypes/germplasms at Agricultural Research Station Baffa, Mansehra, Pakistan. The experiment was laid out in RCBD with three replications. The results of statistical analysis showed significant differences among genotypes for all characters like days to heading, days to maturity, plant height (cm), number of grain/spike, spike length (cm), 1000 grain weight (g), biological yield (tons/ha), grain yield (tons/ha) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant differences have been observed among treatments, parents, parents (lines), parents (testers), parents (Lines Vs Testers) and parents Vs crosses for all the characters except days to maturity and days to flowering (75%), phenol color reaction in Parents (testers), days to flowering (75%), number of spikelets/spike, biological yield/plant (gm), seed hardness, phenol color reaction in parents (lines Vs testers), flag leaf area (cm) 2 in parents Vs crosses (Table-1). The same result is indicated by Cheema et al, (2006) [3] , Desheva and Kyosev (2015) [8] , Ghaffar et al, (2018) [6] . In the present investigation, in general, the mean, range performance and genotypic coefficient of variation and phenotypic coefficient of variation of the parents and F1s for all eight characters are presented in Table no.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The significant differences have been observed among treatments, parents, parents (lines), parents (testers), parents (Lines Vs Testers) and parents Vs crosses for all the characters except days to maturity and days to flowering (75%), phenol color reaction in Parents (testers), days to flowering (75%), number of spikelets/spike, biological yield/plant (gm), seed hardness, phenol color reaction in parents (lines Vs testers), flag leaf area (cm) 2 in parents Vs crosses (Table-1). The same result is indicated by Cheema et al, (2006) [3] , Desheva and Kyosev (2015) [8] , Ghaffar et al, (2018) [6] . In the present investigation, in general, the mean, range performance and genotypic coefficient of variation and phenotypic coefficient of variation of the parents and F1s for all eight characters are presented in Table no.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Such differences are associated with macroenvironmental factors, especially the technological management in Itutinga, with improvement in soil structure and fertility and a greater presence of straw, which helps maintain moisture (Thind et al 2019) Multi-location analysis (Table 3) showed that the genetic variance (σ 2 g ) among cultivars, free of the cultivar × location interaction, was not null (P < 0.05) for HGT and W1000, and not significant for HW and YLD. As Ghaffar et al (2018)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%