2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/542541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Testing in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Using Massive Parallel Sequencing

Abstract: High throughput methods such as next generation sequencing are increasingly used in molecular diagnosis. The aim of this study was to develop a workflow for the detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations using massive parallel sequencing in a 454 GS Junior bench top sequencer. Our approach was first validated in a panel of 23 patients containing 62 unique variants that had been previously Sanger sequenced. Subsequently, 101 patients with familial breast and ovarian cancer were studied. BRCA1 and BRCA2 exon enrichm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, because of the limitation of bioinformatic personnel in most clinical laboratories, most of the analysis relies on packaged software. 28 In this study, we have demonstrated that pyrosequencing output data could be amenable to systematic quantitative analysis and pinpointed the drawback of data analysis with only one algorithm. NGS data usually contain a lot of nonspecific signals/errors; therefore, it is important to distinguish systematic error from real variations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, because of the limitation of bioinformatic personnel in most clinical laboratories, most of the analysis relies on packaged software. 28 In this study, we have demonstrated that pyrosequencing output data could be amenable to systematic quantitative analysis and pinpointed the drawback of data analysis with only one algorithm. NGS data usually contain a lot of nonspecific signals/errors; therefore, it is important to distinguish systematic error from real variations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Patients and families with mutations should be informed of the limitations of these approaches and then should be followed up and managed by a multidisciplinary team over an extended time period [ 94 ]. The centralization of genetic testing enables the improvement of access and quality of testing and allows for the creation of a more comprehensive database for research, guiding evidence-based management recommendations [ 89 91 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, several multigene panels that include known ovarian cancer-associated loci have been introduced for the screening of germline mutations [ 89 91 ]. Nevertheless, there are significant challenges in interpreting and managing panel results.…”
Section: Next-generation Sequencing With Multigene Panelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sanger sequencing is able to detect small variants such as the deletion or insertion of single bases, whereas MLPA identifies large gene rearrangements, such as the deletion or duplication of one or more exons. However, these methods are time consuming and costly (Ruiz et al 2014) and they generally require a significant input of goodquality DNA. The adoption of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has allowed for massive parallel sequencing of multiple genes, ranging from multi-gene panels to whole exomes and genomes (Feliubadalo et al 2013, Hernan et al 2012.…”
Section: Germ Line Brca Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%