2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of Germline Mutation in Hereditary Breast and/or Ovarian Cancers by Next-Generation Sequencing on a Four-Gene Panel

Abstract: Mutation in BRCA1/BRCA2 genes accounts for 20% of familial breast cancers, 5% to 10% of which may be due to other less penetrant genes which are still incompletely studied. Herein, a four-gene panel was used to examine the prevalence of BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, and PTEN in hereditary breast and ovarian cancers in Southern Chinese population. In this cohort, 948 high-risk breast and/or ovarian patients were recruited for genetic screening by next-generation sequencing (NGS). The performance of our NGS pipeline was e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(31 reference statements)
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…INDELseek was applied to a hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer (HBOC) panel dataset of 239 probands [6]. The 4-gene panel targeted germline mutations (Illumina MiSeq).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…INDELseek was applied to a hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer (HBOC) panel dataset of 239 probands [6]. The 4-gene panel targeted germline mutations (Illumina MiSeq).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important mutations in key disease driver genes could be missed in NGS-based genomics studies (e.g. somatic CALR complex indels in myeloproliferative neoplasms [5] and germline BRCA1/BRCA2 complex indels in hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer [6]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, recent manuscripts reporting the findings of clinical panel testing for genes involved in hereditary cancer risk suggests some answers (Chong et al, 2014, Dewey et al, 2014, Judkins et al, 2015, Kurian et al, 2014, Kwong et al, 2016, Laduca et al, 2014, Lincoln et al, 2015, Mannan et al, 2016, Maxwell et al, 2014, Shirts et al, 2016, Susswein et al, 2015, Tung et al, 2014, Yorczyk et al, 2014). The main conclusion of each of these manuscripts is that panel testing for multiple known cancer risk genes increases diagnostic success rate by identifying more medically actionable family-specific genetic findings than testing one or a few genes.…”
Section: Are Rare Genetic Variants Medically Important?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were collected from published manuscripts by clinical laboratories performing sequence interpretation. (Kwong et al, 2016, Laduca et al, 2014, Lincoln et al, 2015, Mannan et al, 2016, Maxwell et al, 2014, Shirts et al, 2016, Susswein et al, 2015, Tung et al, 2014)…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA sequencing is one of the promising approaches or building blocks in development of systems medicine. The successful development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology [4][5][6][7] is a step forward in search of the linkage between human disorders and genetic defects arising from DNA mutation. The availability of supercomputers in handling the big data analysis of the NGS raw data of DNA/ RNA extracted from patient biological samples is making the technique feasible as a routine molecular pathological test.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%