In June 2015, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced a new policy highlighting the expectation that sex as a biological variable (SABV) be factored into research designs, analyses, and reporting of vertebrate animal and human studies. NIH-funded research grants and career-development grants are now under this new policy and the first scientific reviews are complete. Since implementation of this policy, the research community has voiced concern about exactly how to study males and females, particularly in basic research. Investigators are asking: ''What does it mean to consider SABV?'' This commentary serves to provide some perspective. Purpose and Background T he Sex as a Biological Variable (SABV) policy is part of the National Institutes of Health's (NIH's) reenergized focus on the importance of rigor and transparency to reproducibility, including appropriate accounting for the potential influence of sex on experimental outcomes in preclinical research. 1-3 Just like randomization, blinding, sample-size calculations, and other basic design elements, consideration of sex is a critical component of experimental design. 2,4 Specifically: The NIH expects investigators to explain how relevant biological variables, such as sex, age, weight, and underlying health condition, are factored into research designs and analyses of studies in vertebrate animals and humans. This applies to basic, preclinical, and clinical research. Studies proposing to use only one sex should provide strong justification from the scientific literature or preliminary data to support this decision. Cost alone and absence of known sex differences are inadequate justifications for not addressing SABV. 5,6