2019
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765201920180387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic parameters, path analysis and indirect selection of agronomic traits of cassava germplasm

Abstract: This study aimed to estimate genetic parameters and correlations between morphological, agronomic and root quality traits of cassava plants, as well as to study cause and effect relationships through path analysis. A total of 814 genotypes were evaluated from 2011 to 2015. The joint analysis of the data was performed by the mixed models approach. The predicted genetic values of the genotypes were used to estimate the genetic correlations among as well the path analysis. The estimates of heritability of the gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative coefficients of variation (CV r ) were lower than 1 for all the traits analyzed, indicating an unfavorable situation for direct selection of these traits under drought and early harvest. When this occurs, due to higher environmental variation among genotypes than genetic variation, indirect selection carried out by means of path analysis in target environments can be a method that allows high genetic gains to be obtained (Diniz and Oliveira 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relative coefficients of variation (CV r ) were lower than 1 for all the traits analyzed, indicating an unfavorable situation for direct selection of these traits under drought and early harvest. When this occurs, due to higher environmental variation among genotypes than genetic variation, indirect selection carried out by means of path analysis in target environments can be a method that allows high genetic gains to be obtained (Diniz and Oliveira 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that reason, Mulualem and Ayenew (2012) suggest not using final root weight (production) as an explanatory variable in the path analysis. Diniz and Oliveira (2019) report an alternative of using starch production as an explanatory trait. They obtained R 2 above 97% and a low residual correlation value (0.14).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High heritability value in a broad sense and the high genetic advance in character means that the character is under control of the influence of additive genes which indicates that selection in germplasm should lead to a rapid increase in the trait [15]. Additionally, [16] stated that fresh weight of tuber and plant height had high heritability value as 31% and 62%, respectively. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate genetic variation and genetic advance of three cassava clones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…indicated that cassava genotypes significantly (P < 0.05) affected all the tested variables (LAI at 12 MAP, plant biomass, CMD incidence, CBB incidence, cyanide potential, starch content, length of root neck, root diameter, root length, number of marketable roots per plot, weight of marketable roots per plot and total fresh root yield [Mt ha−1 ]).Among the cassava genotypes, LAI at 12 MAP and plant biomass ranged from 2.22[21] (TMS 961708) to 7.26[20] (B1-5) and 300[20] (B1-5) to 665[22] (NR110178) kg per plant, respectively, while CMD and CBB incidence ranged from 5.0%[6] (B4-6) to 70.0% and 26.0% to 85.0%, respectively. The cassava genotype[10] (TMS 010354) exhibited the highest CMD incidence which was higher by 92.9% relative to the lowest disease incidence recorded in [20] B1-5 cassava genotype, while[4] B1-78 had the lowest CBB incidence percentage, which was lower by 69.4% relative to the highest CBB disease incidence recorded in[25] NR100486 and[26] NR100449 cassava genotypes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%