2014
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n5p2843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic parameters for weight gain and body measurements for Nile tilapias by random regression modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study and the one from Nguyen et al (2010), the fish were harvested at an average body weight of 560 g, whereas it was only 250-300 g in the latter studies (Nguyen et al 2007;Ponzoni et al 2011;Hamzah et al 2014). In agreement with our findings regarding the small common family effect for body shape, other studies in Nile tilapias, using multi-trait models (Yoshida et al 2013) and random regression analysis (Rutten et al 2005;Turra et al 2012;Conti et al 2014), reported that common family effect is more important in early than later phases of growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this study and the one from Nguyen et al (2010), the fish were harvested at an average body weight of 560 g, whereas it was only 250-300 g in the latter studies (Nguyen et al 2007;Ponzoni et al 2011;Hamzah et al 2014). In agreement with our findings regarding the small common family effect for body shape, other studies in Nile tilapias, using multi-trait models (Yoshida et al 2013) and random regression analysis (Rutten et al 2005;Turra et al 2012;Conti et al 2014), reported that common family effect is more important in early than later phases of growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%